In article <4e6bfa01c3barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Barry E Allen <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <4e6bdcfba8tim@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Hill <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In article <4e6bd46facbarry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Barry E Allen > > <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Netsurf is very competent but doesn't have Javascript. I don't > > > think that me raising this on the Netsurf list will change this. > > No. This has been discussed ad nauseam there and elsewhere. The > > developers have taken a stand against javascript inclusion. > I don't think that they have taken a *stand* against Javascript > inclusion. > See:- > http://netsurf.sourceforge.net/info Okay, "JavaScript is currently 'not planned'" is what then? A stand against them personally implementing it; it's down to someone else. [Snip] That was rhetorical. Please remove chatter to a newsgroup. We should leave this list to machine support issues. -- Tim Hill, <URL:http://www.timil.com/> --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support