Greetings,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Kumara Guru <gurukumara at gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, since when did the Enterprise looked to public mailing lists for
answers and shared plans of their deployments? Glad, you put the
public mailing list in its place. Yet, when the OP was looking for a
LAMP setup, it was immediately assumed he is an Enterprise guy and
there was a completely unjustified suggestion "Don't touch (even think
about) Fedora, Ubnutu etc. as a server platform for new production
apps". How is this useful?
Make no mistake, I have nothing against RHEL/CentOS but you cannot
trivialize another distro like Ubuntu just like that, or argue that a
completely arbitrary N-years support cycle is the clincher without
considering the specific internals of the organization itself.
If tomorrow, RHEL or Ubuntu provided 20 years extended support for every
release, will it be any more useful?
Anyways, as I previously mentioned, Wikipedia effectively migrated to
Ubuntu LTS Servers.