[Ilugc] LAMP setup which distro is good
- From: raju.rajsand@xxxxxxxxx (Rajagopal Swaminathan)
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:39:58 +0530
Greetings,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Kumara Guru <gurukumara at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
<raju.rajsand at gmail.com> wrote:
Ubuntu is backed by Canonical and they do offer commercial support services.
If this is what your PHBs need, it's already available for Ubuntu.
http://www.ubuntu.com/business/services/server
I can see that that Shri Rahul Sundaram has aptly answered to this query.
Redhat has committed itself to Open source and continues to be so.
Disclaimer: I have never had ay employment opportunity at Redhat. I am
speaking from my experience. I had attended to three calls from Novell
Netware 3.12 to Netware 4.1 in last week alone as a freeelancer. FYKI.
Novell has been taken over by another company recently (I don't
remember the name).
The point is, a production environment runs long after its deployment.
I know of clipper and foxpro production systems running to date (and
fate) to this day.
If this is ignored, peril of support (paid or unpaid) remains a PIA.
Ubuntu LTS v/s Redhat = 5 v/s 7 (now 10) years.
Do your maths and decide.
Above IMHO, of course.
--
Regards,
Rajagopal
Other related posts:
