On 2004-04-21 at 12:21:10 [-0400], Axel Dörfler wrote: > > Would it be a long, hard process to get jam to make such a BFS image for > > testing purposes? That would be great. > > Depends. Of course, we want to have an automated build, but it's probably not > possible to build an image file containing an OpenBeOS installation that you > could use right away with Bochs - the BeOS cache doesn't allow this to work > reliably, unfortunately. > > However, it will be possible to install OpenBeOS on a mounted volume using > Jam. That one you can use directly to boot from, but again, you won't be able > to use it in Bochs until a reboot due to the BeOS cache. There is not much we > can do about it. So /bin/sync doesn't fully flush the cache? > Basically, I understand "beta" to be feature complete, "alpha" to be a work > in progress. Actually, I wanted to switch to "alpha" as soon as we have hard > drive access. It's hard to estimate the status of the kernel given those > levels. Some parts are 100% done, others are 100% missing, many are somewhere > in between :) > And testing is actually something that is a lot of effort as well. I have to agree with you here. I wouldn't call a kernel that we can't boot from BFS to be alpha yet. Michael