> Em Seg, Janeiro 29, 2007 7:37 am, Thom Holwerda escreveu: > > > BeFS, this might not be a problem at all. > > It is BFS, not BeFS. :P It actually depends on who you talk to unless I remember wrong. Anyone with familiarity with BeOS knows it's BFS, but for some bizarre reason, Linux refers to it as BeFS (or at least did last I knew). --DarkWyrm