>Agreed. I think preference apps need their own top-level directory. The intention, originally, was to have the preferences apps together with the kit that they represent. That way, if there were shared includes or whatever, it would work out better. That was my thinking. Ithamar and others felt differently. Since it is a matter of opinion and Ithamar is doing the work, he is doing it his way with my blessing. >I've never used CVS before, I assume it's not hard to check things in. The >CVS doco on the web site doesn't mention anything about it. > >Sikosis > > >At 01:11 PM 24/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: > >> > The preferences team has been checking stuff in already, in the >> > scattered directories >> > that I made. To be honest, I still like my original plan, but no one >> > else does, so I am going >> > along. Really, it is an opinion thing. ;-) >> > >> > I would recommend putting Workspaces in the app_kit's preferences >> > directory, in a subdir. That >> >>I haven't found that directory in CVS, that's why I asked. Anyway, I >>already followed Daniel Reinholds suggestion and made a top-level >>directory "prefs". >> >>Since not all preferences applications are App Kit related, I also >>think that makes sense (to have top-level preferences & apps >>directories). >> >>I am curious about the upcoming structure, so keep on :-) >> >>Adios... >> Axel.