Hi, On 25 April 2010 13:03, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010-04-25 at 12:52:34 [+0200], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2010-04-23 at 01:33:10 [+0200], Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > On 22 April 2010 17:25, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On 2010-04-22 at 15:48:07 [+0200], Niels Reedijk >> > > <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> >> > I have added yet another iteration of the script. Please see the page >> > for details on what it does. Basically: it does automatic markup, it >> > distinguishes between change sets that need to be reviewed, that need >> > to be merged, that are merged and those that should not merge. No more >> > manual layouting is needed. >> > >> > Note that the actual update of the mark up depends on when a new >> > change set is added to the list, only then the script will reformat. >> >> ATM the script doesn't get the markup right. Only the most recent unreviewed >> revisions are bold. > > Mmh, or maybe it's not the script. When editing the page, the markup is > there. Also when showing the page source in the browser there are '<strong>' > tags. Still, none of the browsers I've tried (Firefox 3.5.9, Konqueror 4.3.5, > WebPositive 444) shows any bold markup after the first nine table rows. It is the script. The following line is generated: ||''r36455''||''tracker''||''anevilyak''||''stippi''||''ok''' ''|| || Here's what went wrong: stippi (not deliberately name calling here :-) edited the page and put in the mark-up, and he left a space at the end after the formatting tags. The script strips all the mark-up, but only from the beginning and the end of the string. That's where it went wrong this time. So please, everyone: don't worry about making the right mark-up updates when editing the page, the script will update it on the next run. N>