On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Fredrik Holmqvist <fredrik.holmqvist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eh, I don't think this makes sense.. If extra architecture stuff was limited to a few directories, this may work... however the architecture code is a mix of define macros, source code, and build scripts. (all things that wouldn't merge easily)2014-02-18 21:26 GMT+01:00 Jérôme Duval <korli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:As I said on IRC, +1 on removing the non-working archs from buildbot, but I don't see the point in removing sources from the tree, it will+1. Moreover removing sources from the tree doesn't ease buildtools testing.cause trouble to the few trying to maintain branches for those with having to revert commits.Personally I think each arch should be on its own remote branch. Easy to see what changes happened since last worked on, simpler jam files.
