[gmpi] Re: Parameters / controls / GMPI event system - refreshment
- From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 01:00:06 +0100
On Thursday 01 December 2005 00.25, Chris Grigg wrote:
[...]
> But my point still holds: you still need to get the order of arrival
> right, because one message may undo the action of another. If the
> order is swapped, the performance is, uhm, inverted or something.
Why would events talking about the same (virtual) voice ever arrive
out of order?
I don't think it's unreasonable to require that event order is
preserved. The way I see it, control event streams are basically
multichannel, interleaved, variable rate, structured "audio" streams.
If you can stream audio without scrambling the samples, you can
stream timestamped events without randomly reordering them.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- Audiality -----------------------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source audio engine for games and multimedia. |
| MIDI, modular synthesis, real time effects, scripting,... |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
