[geocentrism] Re: translational motion of the earth......
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:08:22 +1100
From your chaotic writings I infer that your view is that:
* In HC the Earth rotates around two axes:
1) The daily rotational axis pointing towards the celestial poles.
2) The yearly rotational axis pointing towards the ecliptic poles.
IS THAT YOUR VIEW OF A HELIOCENTRIC SOLAR SYSTEM?
YES or NO!
- Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Pay attention Regner,
>
> I am attaching these diagrams again so as to offer yet another oportunity
> to join the team and come in for the big win........................Now what
> do all these have in common...UMMMMM .........I wonder if it has anything to
> do with the roatation of a fixed camera (over the course of a year) around
> the sun on the earth's "translational orbit"....of that very same sun........
> .umm .........................you see there is more then one way to
> demonstrate rotation on earth on 2 different axis ...And you thought I was
> just making it all up......shame on you for thinking such a thing... ...:-)
>
> If whatever rotational condition produces nightly star trails then that
> same condition must produce annual ones as well (if any such motion exist)
> there will be a clear distinction between the two sets of star trails because
> the distance of a star from what ever axis exist determines the size of star
> trails. Since the two axis are offset by 23.44 degrees the stars cannot all
> have the same distance from both axis simultaneous thus, if the motion
> existed there would have to be different sets of star trails with different
> sizes.... In fact if the HC motion really existed it would just all be a big
> blur........
>
Other related posts:
