[geocentrism] Re: irrelevancy of creation science.
- From: Carl Felland <cfelland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:47:51 -0600
Cheryl,
I know this all too well, with a family member who is an ardent
Creationists wondering if I've gone off the deep end as I examine a
static earth.
Carl
Cheryl B. wrote:
>Philip -- I admire your steadfast faith in Scripture. I don't think the
>Creation Scientists like ICR, AiG, Kent Hovind and the rest of them believe
>in any evolution whatever. In fact I know they don't. They believe in a
>young earth, say 6,000 years old, and that every living creature was created
>in an instant, fully grown and complete. They are trying to debunk the
>evolutionists the way we are trying to debunk the helios.
>
>The only problem with the Creationists is that they treat the geocentrists
>as orphan outcasts, kind of like the way Right to Life treats the prolife
>street activists like Missionaries to the Preborn and other more activist
>prolifers.
>
>Bible says love of money is the root of all evil, and after awhile
>ministries and "movements" take on a life of their own, become money-making
>ventures that must be preserved for that purpose, making money -- and the
>original mission gets forgotten or even opposed lest it result in the
>business not being "needed" anymore.
>
>BTW -- Are you an Australian?
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Cheryl
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <creation@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 6:26 PM
>Subject: [geocentrism] irrelevancy of creation science.
>
>
>
>
>>The creationists believe that if 'C' decayed then so
>>did radioactive decay also decay and this would make rocks younger.
>>Jack
>>a copy to creation, because this is their cup of tea.
>>
>>This question is irrelevant. Creation science is a contradiction in terms.
>>
>>
>I repeat what I have said everywhere so often.
>
>
>>When Adam was created, he was a young man, what , say 18 years old, and
>>
>>
>we know that creation scientists examining him would certify that he was
>18.years old.
>
>
>>We know that when Adam walked upon the earth in the garden, and waded in
>>
>>
>the river, creation scientists examining this river would declare it
>geologically as being millions of years old, yet we know that it is no more
>than a few weeks old...
>
>
>>Likewise the tall cedars... in the forest.. Real annular rings showing the
>>
>>
>seasons......according to as God willed they would have had.
>
>
>>Creation science is a contradiction in terms... God Created a geologically
>>
>>
>old world, instantly, perhaps a day, for our intellectual inferiority to
>accept.
>
>
>>For so called Christians to say that God used controlled physical
>>
>>
>evolution over aeons, to produce this universe, is a denial of His infinite
>power.
>
>
>>What next, some natural scientific explanation for rhe ressurection of
>>
>>
>Jesus? Its already coming. watch for it.
>
>
>>Philip.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
