[geocentrism] Re: dopp;er...

  • From: geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:33:40 +0100

Philip wrote:
> I meant to say the same thing to Mike or Alan in regard to their weak
> response over my explanation of aberration. I posted the four main types of
> aberration in optics/astronomy, and the only difference which gave them
> their names was the application of the same principle of operation.
> 
> Philip.

You'd better repost it then, I don't remember that.  I remember you 
googling "aberration" and inapropiately then trying to apply what you 
read to what Alan was talking about.

What was your position on aberraton again?

Regards,
Mike.

Other related posts: