[geocentrism] Proof of heliocentrism
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 09:24:51 +0100
I have decided to start a new thread now that stellar parallax or the celestial
ploes is not a proof for either heliocentrism or geocentrism.
Might it not be quicker for all of us, in our discussion regarding the
helio/geo debate, to ask Regner for just one proof of heliocentrism. So far it
would appear that the M-M etc. experiments are all being interpreted and
corrected by heliocentric theories. This is pointless since it is the helio
idea that is being questioned. The problem, if any with the interferometer
experiments, has to be addressed exactly for what it is and not quetioned by
that which it questions - does that make grammatical sense?. I think it would
be useful to know just what helio's pin their position on. As with evolution it
may be easier to highlight the scientific problems and flaws with
heliocentricity, since that is the current paradigm, rather than spend endless
hours trying to convince helios to consider geocentrism arguments.
Therfore would Regner give just one proof of heliocentrism?
Jack
Other related posts:
