[geocentrism] Re: Point a) - the ether
- From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:25:40 +0000
Paul Deema wrote:
I thought I was just following your example Paul. Wasn't it me who
included that attachment?
Did you not read Robert's responses to the attachment regarding the
experiments and the comments quoted by others? I think there is every
reason to be upbeat as they say.
Regarding the second coming - continue to keep holding your breath!
Jack
Jack L
It's easy to get carried away with enthusiasm when someone says
something which supports you but we should all be careful not to
misunderstand or misquote -- please see attachment.
Immanent? So is the Second Coming and that's been immanent for two
millenia.
Paul D
Other related posts:
