Correction : The reference line passes through the equator (latitude = 0). Else the effect of latitude makes the analysis more complex. Better addressed later. Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Bennett > Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 12:23 PM > To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Fw: [creation] Moon landings? > > > Philip, > > > > > Word diagram. Take a straight line out to infinity from Earth > > central. Place an arrow pointing up above this line. Thats east, > > and one under pointing down. thats west. This is a 24 hour > > rotating force vector downwards toward the west. This force > > pervades all space, and obviously it will have greater > > momentum/speed the further from the centre you go. > > > > This speculative theory, and it is mere speculation, maintains > > that all mass/matter in space is constrained to move within > > "restricted bounds" either side of a radial from earth centre. In > > effect the force that carries the cosmos of sun stars at such > > apparent velocities, also must act upon any other bodies in > > space. The force forward (the future?) to the west may be greater > > all the way, than the force backward, (the past?) That is, it > > will always be easier to navigate against the cosmos rotation, > > than it is to navigate ahead of it, and this force increases > > either way the further one is from the centre of rotation, the earth. > > > > The inertial navigation systems upon appollo would show what NASA > > expects to see. Not necessarily the reality. > > > > Now that was my geocentric theory. But let us suppose for a > > moment, that NASA,made a big mistake and told a bigger lie. More > > on this to come, after I look at the course they claimed to > have taken... > > > > Philip. > > > > We are very close to agreement on the plenum's effect on objects (PEO, > hence). > > Using a line from the earth's core out to the WAF, as you did, here's my > detailed speculative but empirical model: > > 1) in deep space the objects feel the maximum PEO - period = 24 hrs - 4 > min, E to W > 2) as we approach earth, the PEO weakens: Sun's period = 24 hrs, E to W > 3) again moving closer, Moon's period = 24hrs + 52 mins, E to W. > 4) but at 6 1/2 earth radii, the geostat distance, the PEO > weakens to zero. > 5) with decreasing distance within the geostat distance, the PEO increases > FROM W TO E. > 6) at the highest levels of the atmosphere PEO causes air motion > W to E, as > observed in the high-level general circulation of jet streams and > prevailing > westerlies. At lower levels atmospheric forces of air temp and pressure > dominate over the weaker PEO. > > OK, Philip - tear it apart... > > Pax Christi, frater. > > Robert > > > >