[geocentrism] Re: Fw: [creation] Moon landings?
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:46:15 -0500
Correction : The reference line passes through the equator (latitude = 0).
Else the effect of latitude makes the analysis more complex. Better
addressed later.
Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Robert Bennett
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 12:23 PM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Fw: [creation] Moon landings?
>
>
> Philip,
>
> >
> > Word diagram. Take a straight line out to infinity from Earth
> > central. Place an arrow pointing up above this line. Thats east,
> > and one under pointing down. thats west. This is a 24 hour
> > rotating force vector downwards toward the west. This force
> > pervades all space, and obviously it will have greater
> > momentum/speed the further from the centre you go.
> >
> > This speculative theory, and it is mere speculation, maintains
> > that all mass/matter in space is constrained to move within
> > "restricted bounds" either side of a radial from earth centre. In
> > effect the force that carries the cosmos of sun stars at such
> > apparent velocities, also must act upon any other bodies in
> > space. The force forward (the future?) to the west may be greater
> > all the way, than the force backward, (the past?) That is, it
> > will always be easier to navigate against the cosmos rotation,
> > than it is to navigate ahead of it, and this force increases
> > either way the further one is from the centre of rotation, the earth.
> >
> > The inertial navigation systems upon appollo would show what NASA
> > expects to see. Not necessarily the reality.
> >
> > Now that was my geocentric theory. But let us suppose for a
> > moment, that NASA,made a big mistake and told a bigger lie. More
> > on this to come, after I look at the course they claimed to
> have taken...
> >
> > Philip.
> >
>
> We are very close to agreement on the plenum's effect on objects (PEO,
> hence).
>
> Using a line from the earth's core out to the WAF, as you did, here's my
> detailed speculative but empirical model:
>
> 1) in deep space the objects feel the maximum PEO - period = 24 hrs - 4
> min, E to W
> 2) as we approach earth, the PEO weakens: Sun's period = 24 hrs, E to W
> 3) again moving closer, Moon's period = 24hrs + 52 mins, E to W.
> 4) but at 6 1/2 earth radii, the geostat distance, the PEO
> weakens to zero.
> 5) with decreasing distance within the geostat distance, the PEO increases
> FROM W TO E.
> 6) at the highest levels of the atmosphere PEO causes air motion
> W to E, as
> observed in the high-level general circulation of jet streams and
> prevailing
> westerlies. At lower levels atmospheric forces of air temp and pressure
> dominate over the weaker PEO.
>
> OK, Philip - tear it apart...
>
> Pax Christi, frater.
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
