[geocentrism] Re: Erratum: Two spin axes of Earth? - Fig. 3.

  • From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:47:06 +1100

Thanks, Philip.
It is indeed tiring...

    Kind regards,

        Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> That you then choose to ignore and misrepresent my answers to those
> questions,
> is something I can only interpret as an insult. Other people on this board,
> seem perfectly capable of understanding my posts.
> 
> > .......so why do you keep brining this up.....?
> >
> I realized I had made a mistake, and being a scientist, I corrected it.
> If that somehow offends you, so be it - that's your problem.
> 
>      Regner Trampedach
> 
> You are doing the same to me Allen.. You might have had Access to President
> Rooseveldt, way back then, but you must be getting senile now..  So slow down
> and think before you mistype everything again.. Think. 
> 
>   Everyone cant think but yourself..  according to Allen..    Thats not funny
> or insulting, but its tiring.. 
> 
> Philip. 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Regner Trampedach 
>   To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>   Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:49 PM
>   Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Erratum: Two spin axes of Earth? - Fig. 3.
> 
> 
>   Quoting Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>   > Regner
>   >   "This figure does not present my view of the Solar system.
>   >  It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post:"
>   > 
>   >   LOL......This figure does not represent ours either as i have made a
> point
>   > in my post,
>   >
>   You have strongly indicated that your view of HC has two axes of rotation.
>   The corrected Fig. 3 shows the only way to get those two axes of rotation
>    - and I showed that the model depicted in the corrected Fig. 3 disagrees
>   hugely with observations, and has nothing to do with a heliocentric Solar
>   system.
> 
>   You asked some questions:
>     //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00444.html
>   and I spent a lot of time answering those questions as carefully as I
> could:
>     //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html
>   That you then choose to ignore and misrepresent my answers to those
> questions,
>   is something I can only interpret as an insult. Other people on this
> board,
>   seem perfectly capable of understanding my posts.
> 
>   > .......so why do you keep brining this up.....?
>   >
>   I realized I had made a mistake, and being a scientist, I corrected it.
>   If that somehow offends you, so be it - that's your problem.
> 
>        Regner Trampedach
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   -- 
>   No virus found in this incoming message.
>   Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
>   Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1128 - Release Date:
> 13/11/2007 11:09 AM
> 
> 


Other related posts: