Thanks, Philip. It is indeed tiring... Kind regards, Regner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > That you then choose to ignore and misrepresent my answers to those > questions, > is something I can only interpret as an insult. Other people on this board, > seem perfectly capable of understanding my posts. > > > .......so why do you keep brining this up.....? > > > I realized I had made a mistake, and being a scientist, I corrected it. > If that somehow offends you, so be it - that's your problem. > > Regner Trampedach > > You are doing the same to me Allen.. You might have had Access to President > Rooseveldt, way back then, but you must be getting senile now.. So slow down > and think before you mistype everything again.. Think. > > Everyone cant think but yourself.. according to Allen.. Thats not funny > or insulting, but its tiring.. > > Philip. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Regner Trampedach > To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:49 PM > Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Erratum: Two spin axes of Earth? - Fig. 3. > > > Quoting Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Regner > > "This figure does not present my view of the Solar system. > > It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post:" > > > > LOL......This figure does not represent ours either as i have made a > point > > in my post, > > > You have strongly indicated that your view of HC has two axes of rotation. > The corrected Fig. 3 shows the only way to get those two axes of rotation > - and I showed that the model depicted in the corrected Fig. 3 disagrees > hugely with observations, and has nothing to do with a heliocentric Solar > system. > > You asked some questions: > //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00444.html > and I spent a lot of time answering those questions as carefully as I > could: > //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html > That you then choose to ignore and misrepresent my answers to those > questions, > is something I can only interpret as an insult. Other people on this > board, > seem perfectly capable of understanding my posts. > > > .......so why do you keep brining this up.....? > > > I realized I had made a mistake, and being a scientist, I corrected it. > If that somehow offends you, so be it - that's your problem. > > Regner Trampedach > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.31/1128 - Release Date: > 13/11/2007 11:09 AM > >