Regner "This figure does not present my view of the Solar system. It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post:" LOL......This figure does not represent ours either as i have made a point in my post,.......so why do you keep brining this up.....? Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I forgot to attach the figure - sorry about that :-/ Here you go. I'll refer to it as the "corrected Fig. 3". Kind regards, Regner - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Quoting Regner Trampedach : > Sorry for the inconvenience, but my Fig. 3 in the "Two spin axes of Earth?"- > thread, was slightly wrong. The old figure can be found at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/gify7SZlfCOQK.gif > of post //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html > > The old version had the Northern part of the Earth's daily rotation axis > pointing away from the Sun, in the 'close' and 'far' instances of the Earth, > in that figure. That has now been corrected, so that the Northern part of > the > daily rotation axis points towards the Sun in all four cases. > > I repeat: This figure does not present my view of the Solar system. > It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post: > //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html > > Kind regards. > > Regner > > > >