[geocentrism] Re: Erratum: Two spin axes of Earth? - Fig. 3.

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:43:13 -0800 (PST)

Regner
  "This figure does not present my view of the Solar system.
 It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post:"

  LOL......This figure does not represent ours either as i have made a point in 
my post,.......so why do you keep brining this up.....?

Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
  I forgot to attach the figure - sorry about that :-/
Here you go. I'll refer to it as the "corrected Fig. 3".

Kind regards,

Regner

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Quoting Regner Trampedach :

> Sorry for the inconvenience, but my Fig. 3 in the "Two spin axes of Earth?"-
> thread, was slightly wrong. The old figure can be found at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/gify7SZlfCOQK.gif
> of post //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html
> 
> The old version had the Northern part of the Earth's daily rotation axis
> pointing away from the Sun, in the 'close' and 'far' instances of the Earth,
> in that figure. That has now been corrected, so that the Northern part of
> the
> daily rotation axis points towards the Sun in all four cases.
> 
> I repeat: This figure does not present my view of the Solar system.
> It is a fabrication to illustrate a point, as made in my post:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/geocentrism/11-2007/msg00590.html
> 
> Kind regards.
> 
> Regner
> 
> 
> 
> 


Other related posts: