God can use us all for a greater purpose.
If we have strived and debated on this forum, for example, and arrive at a disproof of the heliocentric (and therefore acentric) paradigm, which I believe is where we now are, then we have moved significantly nearer to the truth.
If, then, one or more heliocentrists score an equalizer and disprove the geocentric model, what would we be left with?
Well, as Steven says, we would need to throw them both in the bin. But doing that would not be defeat, but rather another step nearer the truth.
(Blast. We would need another name for the website!)
Neville
Interesting question dear Jack, with the concave Earth,
heliocentrism/acentrism/geocentrism, it's all irrelevant! The Earth is
the nucleus of life if you like, you can forget other planets because it
is only within the World that we live, shielded like in a womb from
whatever lies beyond. If the concave Earth could be proven, it would be
the end of it all. No more vast distances even, and a creator would be
the most obvious thing ever.
In support of the concave Earth:
Question, why does a mercury leveled telescope looking out to sea with
engraved central cross-hairs feature the ocean above the cross-hairs
rather than at the centre or below?
Interesting indeed....
Brotherly love,
Steven.
Jack Lewis wrote:
> Dear Steven,
> Regarding the concave model, what do they say about heliocentrism?
>
> Jack
>>
>
