[geocentrism] Re: Bible anomolies
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 17:10:22 +0100
Dear Neville,
Thanks for your question but the problem will be that your's, Philip's and my
theology is irreconcilable. So anything I say would be a waste of time, I'm
sure you must realise that. Time will eventually tell.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:36 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Bible anomolies
Dear Jack,
I need to pick up on this paragraph that you sent to Paul, but which is
clearly of relevance to any believer:
A Christian who does not believe the litteral interpretation of Genesis and
conveys such to a new Christian runs the risk of being a 'stumbling block' to
him. If the new Christian thinks it is OK to interpret the Bible as one feels,
then how will he know what is OK and what isn't? When the time comes for us all
to give an account of our lives, the worst that can happen to me is that God
could say,"Nice try Jack, but I'm not quite that clever - 6 days does not give
me too much time, however thank you for your support, even if it was a bit
OTT". However the theistic evolutionist could be admonished for not giving God
credit for creation and causing others to go astray (to hell that is) through
his liberal Biblical interpretations.
There are something of the order of 28,000+ sects/schisms/divisions/..., call
them what you will, under the Christian banner. Are not all of these
interpreting the Bible in their own way? Emphasizing certain verses and
ignoring others? To suit the ends of the "church" to which they "belong"?
What about non-Christians? They reject the Bible either in whole, or at least
in large parts. Are they all off to "hell," in your opinion?
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
Other related posts:
