[geocentrism] Re: Angular momentum

I wrote:

 > According to the logic of your proof we would have had the
> following preposterous result:
> 
>     3=-(-3)
>     4.-3 + 5.3 > 0
> => 4 > 5 !!!!!!!!!!

Of course, that should have read,

      -3 = -(3)
    4.-3 + 5.3 > 0
=> 4    - 5   > 0  (dividing all terms by -3)
ie 4 > 5           !!!!!!!!!!

Regards,
Mike.

Other related posts: