[geocentrism] Re: 28 moons
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:35:53 -0400
continued.......This might be the reason the Grav Field is a exponential
decay not a strictly inverse square relationship..
1) It?s been shown that exponential deday can?t explain the
GeoStatDistance
2) Le Sage theory proves the far aether field to be inverse square
When any object is relay near the differences are almost imperceptible while
the further away thy get the more noticeable the difference?.ref attached
charts
Just the reverse. Le Sage aether deviates from 1/r2 in the near field.
3The main difference between the reality and the example is that inertia is
what keeps the moon from averaging more then 0 rotation
Note: the sidereal rotation is not zero; the synodic is.
( no force acting on the body to cause such) where in the tether ball it is
the tether itself that prevents rotation...Gravity being the tether prevents
any additional radial movement in either direction closer or further apart
and inertia prevents or perpetuates the rotational state...
Aether causes inertia and gravity.
but the Libration itself is cyclical as are all vibrations........
Libration can be caused by the planet observer not being on the
center-to-center line => that is, a geometric effect.
5 This I would suggest at least in theory might be good reason to start
with the large scale first and work to the smallest effects....verse as MS
does start with Newtons apple the micro scale and work toward large scale
structures ...Hence 98% of the universe in MS is Dark matter and Dark Energy
becuse newtons apple is microsopic .......this is my postion ...they are
working the problem from the wrong direction......so say I..........
Why not the sandwich model ? bit in from both ends?
Fig. 1
1) If aether is vibrational, why doesn?t it exhibit wave behavior:
interference, diffraction, etc?
2) Does the aether penetrate into matter/ How far?
3) The center of mass not being the geometric center is the same
argument as not being spherical.
4) What causes the gravitational wake?
5) Where the wakes overlap (red stripes)? is that an interference
region where there?s no aether?
6) In the RB model the aether rotates easterly in the wake region,
westerly outside the wake. At the boundary the aether is stationary. I
assume the boundary of the wake in Fig 1 is the GSD. But why? Why do the
vibrations cancel out?
1) Why is the GSD obviously closer that the wake ?
2) I don?t understand how the wake is formed. It should trail behind
the object causing it, but you show the wakes as circular ??
3) How does the size of the planet affect the wake size?
4) Satellites must be closer to planet than moons?.No ? the orbit
radius is independent of mass.
5) The force depends on size and shape(tuning) This implies the
effect is resonance??
1) They do look likes eggs ?ovulating => overlapping? osculating?
2) Physical retuning of stealth aircraft?? Don?t they use an aerofoil
that absorbs at radar frequency ?. All the time.
Robert
Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Other related posts:
