Re: [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
- From: "Goldie, Shaun S" <Shaun.Goldie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 14:42:06 +1200
Even with only two switches you still uplink them to each other
We used 100Meg ports but would probably change to 1G uplinks if we grow
past two switches
5 or 7 ?? is the maximum in a ring without root switches
Shaun
NZ Steel=20
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Kinsinger, Matthew R
Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2007 07:58
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
Looking over all the DIFFERENT information out there, and talking to =3D
some Foxboro reps last week, we're still a bit confused. Is there a =3D
large difference between a Mesh setup with a dedicated Root pair with =3D
nothing but uplink ports vs. not having dedicated root switches and =3D
living with the few 1G uplink ports on the normal switches (edge =3D
switches)? We can easily get by without the need for the root switch 1G
=3D ports, and because of the layout of our facility, it would cost us a =
=3D
significant amount of cabling for each edge pair to touch the roots, and
=3D if we did NOT make each pair touch the roots, then the extra 1G uplin=
k
=3D ports would serve us no purpose.=3D20
Just trying to get a handle on all this. Thanks.
Matt Kinsinger=3D20
PPG Barberton
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=0A=0ANOTICE - This message and any attached files may contain informatio=
n that is confidential and intended only for use by the intended recipien=
t. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for de=
livering the message to the intended recipient, be advised that you have =
received this message in error and that any dissemination, copying or use=
of this message or attachment is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosur=
e of the information therein. If you have received this message in error =
please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
- From: Kinsinger, Matthew R
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
- » Re: [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
- [foxboro] Mesh Root Switches Required?
- From: Kinsinger, Matthew R