Re: [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- From: Stan Ruth <Stan_Ruth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:47:31 -0500
I remember an unfortunate incident about 10 years ago when I worked with
Foxboro's Modplus + integrator on a plant expansion project. The PSS
stated that it worked with all the newer Modicon controllers, which had 6
digit addresses rather than the older controller convention of 5 digits.
As it turned out, when a CAR was submitted, the answer was that the PSS
would be corrected to indicate that only 5 digit addresses could be read.
I find that the information around Modbus/Modbus+ integration is somewhat
confusing, with conflicts between some of the different Foxboro
documentation - clarity would be appreciated.
Stan M. Ruth, P.E.
Process Control Engineer
Engineering - Port Neches Performance Products Site
"Rick Mol" <rdmol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
04/26/2006 09:53 AM
Please respond to foxboro
To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
Greetings, all wise and all knowing list.
We have an application where data from a Carrier chiller needs to be =
brought into the I/A via a Micro I/A. The problem is that, per TAC, the =
Micro I/A will not read the extended Modbus registers (6 digit) 300000 to
=
399999. It only reads 5 digit registers (ex. 30000 to 39999). The =
chiller only supplies register addresses in the extended range.
The FBM224 has the same limitation. The FBM 230 will support extended =
registers, but requires the 270 series controller.
There is no option to move the registers in the chiller. It's just a =
conversion module from BacNet to Modbus. =20
The chiller supports BacNet, so the BacNet to Modbus converter from =
Fieldserver may be an option.
Has anybody else out there ran into something like this?
Thanks and Regards,
Rick Mol
ESCO Company
IT/Automation Admin.
231.727.6409
rdmol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- From: Rick Mol
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- » Re: [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- » Re: [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- [foxboro] Extended Modbus Registers into I/A
- From: Rick Mol