On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:33:22 +0530, Praveen Kumar <praveen97uma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > HI Oscar! > > There can be a facility for users to have a chat between them (one-one or a > group chat). +1, something like Facebook chat? > I did a google search for chat apps that we can just hook into e-cidadania > but looks like > there are not much. I found a few django based personal chat projects that > people have written, so if we > decide to have a chat app, we will have to extend and customize them. If > we want something to be > written from scratch, twisted and tornado are good choice for networking > libraries. The best would be to reuse some project, but as you said, there are not much out there. > Some links: > http://pythonhaven.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/django-powered-ajax-chat-part-1/ > http://code.google.com/p/django-jqchat/ > [Tornado] http://www.tornadoweb.org/ > http://blogger.popcnt.org/2008/01/django-evserver-asynchronous-server-for.html > http://www.skitoy.com/p/django-tornado-chat/305 > [Twisted library] http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Oscar Carballal Prego < > oscar.carballal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am excited to say that we're running out of tickets in the trac. Most >> of >> the bugs and inprovements are already fixed, so here is the planning I >> propose: >> >> As you may know, we're currently on the version 0.1.5. The issue fixes >> needed to set it as a RC (release candidate) are: >> >> - Ticket #30: Check all the views in search of inconsistencies regarding >> permissions. For a full list of the expected permissions and user roles >> please ask me. >> - Ticket #50: Fix the calendar module. The current problem is that if >> the >> translation is activated, the jquery calendar module does not activate >> the >> links towards the real calendar that lists the events and viceversa. >> - Ticket #55: The debate module does not have permissions regarding the >> manipulation of the notes. Everyone can modify the notes and move them. >> - Ticket #166: The "Add debate" form. Currently Tamara Atanasoska is >> working on it. ATM to create a debate it has to be done from the >> administration. Most people asks about "columns" and "rows" and stuff. >> The >> debate module works mostly as a scrum board, you can see an example of a >> scrum board here: https://scrumy.com/demo >> >> We expect to have the 0.1.5 release soon (before the GSoC coding period), >> unless some other release blocker ticket comes out (at the time of >> writing >> this email a bug in django 1.4 raised). >> >> Once 0.1.5 has reached RC quality we need to start the documentation >> update process and the strings translation. The translation is managed >> through the Transifex platform [1] and the merging process of the >> catalogs >> in e-cidadania will be handled by myself at least for now. >> >> Search of new features >> >> I think we can start proposing new features to improve the platform. >> Currently there are a few basic features that at the end of the GSoC >> should >> allow the citizens to complete a participative process using a determined >> workflow (debates->proposals->voting) and that will allow us to release >> the >> 0.2 version (the first public stable) by December. >> >> Just think about tools that can be used: >> >> a) In the platform, to improve communications or realtions between >> citizens >> b) Applications that can be applied to participative democracy, either to >> develop new work methodologies, or improve the current workflow. >> >> Features I propose: >> >> - Personal messaging between users >> - Possibility of publishing a proposal in a social network (needs >> discussion regarding publishing in private spaces) >> >> Best regards, >> Oscar Carballal Prego >> >> -- -- Oscar Carballal Prego