[ddots-l] Re: question about monitoring

  • From: "Craig Spencer" <craigspencer2.0@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:59:12 -0500

Yes I use the 400

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Omar Binno 
  To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 7:06 AM
  Subject: [ddots-l] Re: question about monitoring


  Okay, got it. Craig, are you using the fireface?


  Omar Binno

  AIM: LOD1116
  Skype: obinno1
  Website: www.omarbinno.com
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Craig Spencer 
    To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:59 AM
    Subject: [ddots-l] Re: question about monitoring


    If you have the audio already recorded, then you will here the effects 
because it is playing back through Sonar.

    What you may want to do is have different mixer set ups in the fireface for 
different applications.
    However, you would need sighted assistance to do this.


      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Omar Binno 
      To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
      Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:45 AM
      Subject: [ddots-l] Re: question about monitoring


      Thanks alot for the detailed explanation, Tim. So while I had everything 
plugged into my mixer and not turning on input echo in sonar, the routing was 
taking place through the audio interface/mixer, and not through Sonar? But if 
that is the case, how come I could still hear effects if I inserted them on an 
audio track when playing the project?

      Thanks.

      Omar Binno

      AIM: LOD1116
      Skype: obinno1
      Website: www.omarbinno.com
        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Tim Burgess 
        To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 4:07 AM
        Subject: [ddots-l] Re: question about monitoring


        Hi Omar,

        OK, here's the deal:

        1 - Monitoring via the interface (known as hardware monitoring) means 
that
        you hear a copy of the signal that's coming into the interface from a 
mic,
        guitar, or whatever, without it being processed by your software.  The
        advantage of this is that there's no appreciable delay between what you 
hear
        yourself playing/singing and what comes back at you from the 
speakers/cans.
        The disadvantage is that you won't hear any FX processing that your DAW
        software is adding to the sound (a lot of singers like to ha a bit of 
reverb
        while they're recording and guitarists often don't find it easy to play
        their part "dry");

        2 - Software monitoring (like input echo in Sonar) allows you to hear 
the
        treated signal, so the guitarist can hear that monster noise from 
Amplitube
        and the singer can float away into the space created by a reverb 
plug-in.
        This can sometimes help the creative process, but very often introduces 
a
        small lag (called latency).  On a fast machine with a high-quality 
interface
        and good drivers it should be possible to reduce this delay to a point 
where
        nobody notices or, even if you can hear it, it's so small that nobody 
cares.
        However, if you can't reduce it to this level, for whatever reason, it 
can
        make tracking very difficult as it starts to affect your timing.  

        So, there's no right or wrong (as usual), it's just a case of finding 
what's
        appropriate for the instrument/artist you're dealing with and trying to 
tune
        your software to provide the necessary.  Hope that helps.

        Best wishes.

        Tim Burgess
        Raised Bar Ltd
        Phone:  +44 (0)1827 719822

        Don't forget to vote for improved access to music and music technology 
at

        http://www.raisedbar.net/petition.htm
         
        -----Original Message-----
        From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
        Behalf Of Omar Binno
        Sent: 22 January 2009 07:49
        To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [ddots-l] question about monitoring

        Okay, this is a very rudimentary question. Until now, my studio setup 
has
        included using a mixer and an audio interface with sonar. However, I'm 
now
        switching to just using an audio interface as a stand-alone, without a
        mixer. I will be using the RME Fireface 800. The question now arises: 
should
        I do my input monitoring through sonar, or through the audio interface. 
My
        knowledge is rather foggy as to exactly what monitoring is used for. So
        first, what is monitoring, and second, when using an audio interface 
without
        a mixer, is it preferable to do the monitoring through the interface, or
        through sonar.
         
        Thank you for any and all input.
         
         
        Omar Binno
         
        AIM: LOD1116
        Skype: obinno1
        Website: www.omarbinno.com

        PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
        To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
        ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
        If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
        ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        and in the Subject line type
        unsubscribe
        For other list commands such as vacation mode, 
        click on the immediately following link:
        ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
        send a message, to 
        ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        and in the Subject line type
        faq

Other related posts: