David and I attended a meeting at the recently concluded NAMM show hosted by Sibelius. At the meeting, David spoke to the Sibelius developers to make sure that he was included in the Beta cycle for Sibelius 5. I presume that this is for the express purpose of developing Sibelius Speaking for Sibelius 5. David's declining to develop Sibelius Speaking for Sibelius 4 was the direct result of timing issues with the various development cycles of the products for which he scripts. It was never intended to signal his unwillingness or inability to support future versions of Sibelius through his Sibelius Speaking product. I have every confidence that as soon as the Sibelius 5 Beta cycle begins, David will commence development of Sibelius Speaking for Sibelius 5. As I've explained, our current situations allows us to create both scores and parts in Sibelius 3 which Sibelius 4 users can import. Those Sibelius 4 users can, in turn, export their work back to a Sibelius 3 format file which we can work with. While this is inconvenient, it provided David a breathing space in which he could catch up with Sonar 5 and now Sonar 6. During that time, no further work was going on with Sibelius. Additionally, because of the solution I have explained, David felt sure that his user base was still being served adequately, a view which I share. I hope this explains the state of development and the prospects for the future to everyone's satisfaction. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Henry Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 2:04 PM To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Sibelius: New Ownership Woops, designated last note as last word, but this message from Kevin is so important that I'm breaking silence once more. First, no one would wish work to be undertaken on a programme which will soon be out-of-date. Given that premise, do we assume from your note, Kevin, that you are speaking on David P's behalf so that: A. Sib5 will be open to the addition of accessibility software like SS and; B., David will definitely be willing to resume his excellent work in developing SS for Sib5 regardless of any new Sonars? If so, and I fervently hope it is, then splendid! If not, then I would join others in suggesting that Dancing Dots explore the possibilities of alternative developers for such an important programme not, of course, that anyone else would be able to make the outstanding progress shown by David. Thank you, Cheers, JDH -----Original Message----- From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin L. Gibbs Sent: 28 January 2007 22:06 To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ddots-l] Re: Sibelius: New Ownership For the record, and trust me on this, there is a Sibelius 5 coming. Fear not. David Pinto will be in the loop on the beta cycle which has not begun yet. There's no point in scripting Sibelius 4 because 5 is coming. Tehre will be a Sibelius Speaking 5. We can work with 3 and those who have 4 can export to 3 when necessary. It's a pain but better than nothing. Incidentally, Dave, Digi Design now owns Sibelius. So Sibelius will be around for the long haul. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave Carlson Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:15 PM To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ddots-l] Sibelius: New Ownership Listening to all the concerns over scripting the next generation of Sib Speaking, I think we should all be focusing some of our concern and entreaties to the company who now owns the rights to Sibelius. For all we know, the next version coming out may be totally different or even non-existent. Something that Dancing Dots would need to consider (and I'm sure already have) would be to negotiate a contract with the new company (wish I remembered their name) so that any last accessible version of Sibelius could be distributed to customers with any new version of Sib Speaking, to ensure our continued access to the latest or final release. We may already be at the end of the road, and only just a matter of the new owners telling us to go look somewhere else?. As to older versions of Sib Speaking and any upgrades Jeanine , that is something that Dancing Dots should be able to remedy, given that you made the original purchase. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: <JMMReno@xxxxxxx> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: January 28, 2007 10:24 AM Subject: [ddots-l] Sibelius4 I am writing to express my disappointment and dismay that Sibelius Speaking will not be upgraded for use with Sibelius 4. While the solution suggested by others on this list, namely switching back to Sibelius 3, may be feasible, it is unacceptable in my view. For one thing, I have never upgraded to Sibelius 3 and I no longer have access to Sibelius Speaking 1.3 and Sibelius 2, having mistakenly deleted the setup program for SS 1.3 from my old computer, not anticipating the need to transfer it to a new computer. Although I appreciate the hard work and creativity of David Pinto and others in developing Sibelius Speaking, I have often thought that the ultimate solution would be to develop an application that would evaluate mainstream software to determine its accessibility for visually impaired users, then automatically make the necessary adaptations. In the meantime, one possible solution might be for one developer to devote work to writing JAWS scripts for one application and its upgrades. For example, one person can be responsible only for Sibelius Speaking and another could be responsible for Cake Talking. Or perhaps the development of all JAWS scripts could be a collaboration of several programmers. In either case, I strongly feel that visually impaired computer users deserve the same timely access to mainstream software as sighted users, and I urge Mr. McCann, Mr. Pinto and others concerned with the development of Dancing Dots products to carefully and seriously consider the suggestions that I and others have made in order to prevent this sort of situation from arising again. Jeanine Mooers ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe] ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to: ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ** and in the Subject line type ** unsubscribe ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the ** immediately-following link:- ** [mailto:ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq] ** or send a message, to ** ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq