[softwarelist] Re: Loading pictures into OPro

  • From: Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:25:47 +0100

In message of 23 Jun, "Torrens (lists)" <Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In article <9242dab34f.tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>    Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > For some years now I have been using OPro to construct PDF files that
> > consist of a series of pictures (scans) of old documents.  By and large
> > I find that this can only be done successfully by converting the
> > pictures to (large) sprites.
> 
> I would have thought jpeg files were ideal. I find O-Pro's handling of
> jpegs exemplary and scans of old documents are suficiently granular that
> gifs are large, as are tiffs.

I did say that I was scanning to around 40K for a TIFF file - and that a
GIF of the same was about 60K.

Well I have taken one of these TIFF and, using the old faithful,
DplngScan, converted it to JPEG.  The file size shot up to 566K and the
bits per pixel from 1 to 8.  And never mind the slight deterioration one
always gets when converting to JPEG (and noting that GIF also is lossy).

Curiously for the same image, the Sprite file was a mere 334K.  But this
retained the 1 bpp.

These respective file sizes are consistent across a wide range of
documents.

These 1 bpp files are scanned at 200 dpi.  While this does not give the
best result on screen which has around 80 dpi, it does give a very
legible output on printer which will all handle 300 dpi these days and
most a lot more than that.

But this is not what I was reporting.  I was reporting a few problems
with OPro that led to error messages and difficulties.

-- 
Tim Powys-Lybbe                                          tim@xxxxxxxxx
             For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling

Other related posts: