Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:18:46 +0200
I noticed the loss of interest towards the game too.
Far less hype this time around.
On 30 Jun 2014 19:06, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If the marvel matches are up on Youtube, check them out bra. Top 8.
>
> Scrubeks was playing so well (he took out a lot of notable players), then
> completely lost the plot. This guy has tech for days but did some really
> dumb shit. Not only him, but Busby (C. Viper player) too against PR Rog. I
> hate it when talented players screw up so badly. Some poor decisions in
> parts, bad assist calls, dropped combos, the works. I can also see Flocker
> just doesn't give a damn about this game anymore. His Zero looked tame
> compared to past performances. Under normal circumstances, any confirm from
> him was guaranteed death. This guy was dropping incoming confirms with
> Zero. Check any of his past matches and tell me the amount of times that
> happens.
>
> Main reason I'm so upset about Scrubeks playing the way he did is because
> he could have won the tournament if he was more consistent. He's fun to
> watch and has some really cool combos/setups with MODOK's jamming bomb.
> It's a shame that he threw it all away towards the end.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Was it that bad dude?
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wish I could have stayed up for the USF4 matches. UMvC3 matches made
>>> me want to commit suicide. When Scrubeks lost, I stopped watching and went
>>> to bed.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who watched CEO? Some really crazy matches.
>>>>
>>>> You can find them here, but the titles contain spoilers
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/user/StreetFighterCentral/videos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's a rogue-like game, so actions only take place once you move. You
>>>>> have to keep moving forward because the Darkness chases you and once it
>>>>> catches up, you die. Every action you take causes the darkness to catch
>>>>> up, but you can move forward at a much faster rate than it can catch up.
>>>>>
>>>>> The (initial) goal is to beat the Demon Lord who shows up after 400km
>>>>> on normal difficulty (easy mode, I guess). He's stupidly tough and the
>>>>> odds of you beating him on your first run is basically zero. Here's the
>>>>> interesting bit: After every run you gain Hero Points which you can use
>>>>> to
>>>>> unlock perks and classes for your next run. You can also spend points on
>>>>> a
>>>>> Vault which you can use to store items from previous runs, so if you find
>>>>> a
>>>>> kick-ass sword you can save it there after you die and then it will be
>>>>> available on the next run.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's got a multiplayer mode but you don't really play with other
>>>>> people. You can just see the statuses of other people playing on the same
>>>>> map, and how far they've travelled. If someone gets killed by the Demon
>>>>> Lord, there's a chance you might run into them in ghost form. They drop
>>>>> useful items.
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes a while to get into it but it's one of those "just one more
>>>>> try" type of games.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like fun, if the trailer is anything to go by :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How exactly does the gameplay work? Seems to be a
>>>>>> action-rpg/turn-based hybrid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That One Way Heroics game was totally worth it for R5. Must have
>>>>>>> played it about 50 times already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I contributed about 20 gigs
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:42 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What are we going to do about soundproofing the place?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, nice work on dodging the original topic. HOKAGE?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 1:06 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> have it at jeeva's , theres enough room for everyone. just don't
>>>>>>>> sleepover that place can get cold at night.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:52:55 +0000
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We still have a couple of weeks left. I just don’t want to get to
>>>>>>>> the last minute and realise that I’ll be sitting at home watching it on
>>>>>>>> stream with only Paas and my cats cheering.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I’m going to take Friday off and see if I can actually
>>>>>>>> finish all the Dangerous Dave games.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
>>>>>>>> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:48 PM
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wasn't able to find a suitable venue :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Truth be told, it hasn't been terribly high on my list of
>>>>>>>> priorities this past month, due to other pressing matters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uh, doesn’t Hokage refer to a specific kage – the fire one? Then
>>>>>>>> you have raikage, misukage…
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think your question should’ve been ‘Who is the fifth Kage from
>>>>>>>> Jhb?’
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On an unrelated note, we still don’t have a venue organised for the
>>>>>>>> Evo weekend, do we?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:14 PM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WHO IS THE 5TH HOKAGE FROM JOBURG
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:29:06 +0200
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks fer the words of wisdom Nic. Much appreciated :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn't know that f+BD can hop over ground fireballs. That's
>>>>>>>> really cool. Makes sense but it definitely wasn't something I picked
>>>>>>>> up on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll remember that df+A is good for anti-airing purposes. I've only
>>>>>>>> ever used it as a combo extender into argentine backbreaker *lol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's very little to teach you then, you've got the just of it.
>>>>>>>> Your level up is strong.
>>>>>>>> Ummm.....
>>>>>>>> His EX gatling can be "free cancelled" into another special.
>>>>>>>> He can finish launch combos with an air throw, like Mai.
>>>>>>>> He can use the f+BD to hop over ground fireballs.
>>>>>>>> df+A is a "good" anti air.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...that's all I got.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 10:14, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've noticed :P I've actually been on the receiving end of it so
>>>>>>>> I know how effective it can be :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's one of the throw setups I have (mid-screen):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Argentine Backbreaker (with qcf+C followup), f+BD into super hop
>>>>>>>> j.B, Argentine Backbreaker, rinse and repeat. It looks like Clark goes
>>>>>>>> through (or just slightly above) the opponent during j.B and ends up
>>>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>> opposite side.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The recovery from the j.B is so quick that it appears that Clark is
>>>>>>>> still airborne when the throw comes out. I can alternate between the B
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> D versions depending on the opponent's tendencies. Or I could just do
>>>>>>>> nothing and see what happens. Came across it by chance when I was
>>>>>>>> messing
>>>>>>>> around with Clark's jumps and it seems to work quite well. Might have
>>>>>>>> limited application against a wary opponent but it should be quite
>>>>>>>> effective in the beginning :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have yet to explore all of his options but that will come with
>>>>>>>> time. I just need a functional Clark for now and I think I have that
>>>>>>>> *lol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should add this then.
>>>>>>>> Standing CD
>>>>>>>> Just do it when your opponent has been floored.
>>>>>>>> It kills many wakeup attempts, and Clark is technically airborne
>>>>>>>> during it too. Then you can cancel it with a F+BD and put the fear of
>>>>>>>> god
>>>>>>>> into your opponent with 3 special throw mixups, an EX machinegun combo,
>>>>>>>> well pretty much all options he has.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:37, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LB sensei ftw *lol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I put Clark on the team for two reasons: Damage and LB's hatred of
>>>>>>>> j.CD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>>>> LB with some good advice for a change.
>>>>>>>> Good stuff.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yup, that's the idea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Iori is the battery for the team. I'm glad LB suggested I play him
>>>>>>>> because his confirms are really easy and lead to good damage. Ryo does
>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>> with 2-3 bars. Clark is an absolute monster with 5 and full drive
>>>>>>>> meter.
>>>>>>>> His range is an issue but at that point I'm in gamble mode anyway. All
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> really need to do is just land one hit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's a pretty good team strat actually.
>>>>>>>> Your team gets and more damage from 1st to last. But you have to
>>>>>>>> get closer to your opponent after each loss.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Clark is a problem with meter. His range is an issue.
>>>>>>>> Ryo has good range and uses some meter.
>>>>>>>> EX Iori has great range and builds meter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 08:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah. On point.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ryo second, Clark anchor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you playing ex iori right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:39:31 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should have told me to play Clark ages ago. I've really been
>>>>>>>> missing out *lol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I get good results on Saturday, I'll keep using him :P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:36 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> please sap don't go to the clarkside. stay in the light.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @rich, erm ya thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:34:23 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw, I've been working on those KOF combos LB. I've also added
>>>>>>>> Clark to my team. He's actually not that difficult to use. I even have
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> 100% HD combo with him and legit throw setups after knockdown.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My team order is going to be a little different now but I think I
>>>>>>>> can make it work. I'll be free in Blaz but I'll definitely try my best
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> to be free in KOF *lol*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ryan Williams <
>>>>>>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There's still KOF and BlazBlue LB :P
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rank as it stands now:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Rank*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Participant Name*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Game/Set Wins*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Points Scored*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Luminous
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 12
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 36
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SAPhoenix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 11
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 35
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sigma.g19
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 9
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 30
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lindseyboi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 27
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Zombiehunta
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 24
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> O.M.A. Hei-Long
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 18
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ennohex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 17
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ANGRY MAD JIN
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ugh im number 4 , that's not good
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If memory serves, the suggestion tabled by Lumi is that we subtract
>>>>>>>> 'Points Given Up' from 'Points Scored' and add it to 'Game/Set Wins'
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the final result. Lumi, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ugh...
>>>>>>>> my excel skills r gna be tested today. I shall do it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:09:13 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I thought you guys just wanted to see what the current standings
>>>>>>>> are at the sesh. I didn't know you wanted me to keep that spreadsheet!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I didn't save it :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry LB. You'll just have to do the math man. Either that or wait
>>>>>>>> until we conclude the qualifiers for the final result.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wtf man sap, wheres the excel with the current standings?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:59:40 +0200
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *LOL*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As requested:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://challonge.com/usf4qualifier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://challonge.com/umvc3qualifier
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Morning peeps,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> why am I lagging in d3?????????? this is fkd up , im so jealous of
>>>>>>>> your dps right now paas, my hate for you is strong. half a million dps
>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>> 5 million toughness, almost 8000 dex O_o.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> have you tried to do 100% evasion build? I believe its possible now
>>>>>>>> since you can get over 8000 dex.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @sap, can you link us to the overall standings for the 5v5 please.
>>>>>>>> My predictions are that if we are 7 then I don't think Richard and
>>>>>>>> manase
>>>>>>>> is gna make it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so the final team, in points.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> me - all points
>>>>>>>> gb - below me by a lot
>>>>>>>> lumi - above sap
>>>>>>>> sap - above zombie
>>>>>>>> zombie - above richard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:58:52 +0200
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> along with Lust of the Dead.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The script there was just as riveting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The plot for this movie sounds so crazy I just must get it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A brilliant doctor on a quest for revenge buys a young woman and
>>>>>>>> trains her to be the ultimate assassin, implanting gun parts in her
>>>>>>>> body
>>>>>>>> that she must later assemble and use to kill her target before she
>>>>>>>> bleeds
>>>>>>>> to death.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3141912/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Wham
>>>>>>>> ACDC
>>>>>>>> Red hot Chilli Pepper.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2014 21:49, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The reason it's like that it's because the Japanese have
>>>>>>>> problems pronouncing V so often they write it as a B. As Manase said,
>>>>>>>> Japan doesn't actually have words with a V, but since the introduction
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> Western terms into their vocabulary they were forced to create a
>>>>>>>> symbol for
>>>>>>>> it. Still, in most cases they prefer to use a B. When they know what
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> word means, they'll translate it correctly. For example, Forever is
>>>>>>>> "foeba" in Japanese, but it's common enough for them to know it so
>>>>>>>> translate it with a V. Interestingly enough, even in the original
>>>>>>>> Japanese, they write Mohammad Abdul's name with a V (ヴ) so even
>>>>>>>> when it's translated, it's still Avdol. Westerners know they mean
>>>>>>>> Abdul
>>>>>>>> though. The same thing happens with L and R. Japanese call Rolento
>>>>>>>> "Lorento", presumably because they associate with the Italian name
>>>>>>>> "Lorenzo". In Jojo's Anjuro is more commonly known as "Angelo". At
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> end of the day it just boils down to how familiar they are with the
>>>>>>>> words
>>>>>>>> and names.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've never realised how many of the Jojo's characters are named
>>>>>>>> after music artists/songs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Vanilla Ice
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Steely Dan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kenny G
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Funny Valentine
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Telence T. Darby (should obviously be Terence)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Iggy (Pop?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enya [Gail]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Foo Fighters
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Love the names in Jojos though. Whoever came up with the name
>>>>>>>> "Weather Report" is a genius.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Avdol is how Japanese read and pronounce Abdul but not how the
>>>>>>>> name is written.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what we see and here in games/anime is the mispronunciation of
>>>>>>>> the name which is clearly wrong.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not in Japan. lol
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's Abdul bro :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just watched eps12 and 13 of Stardust Crusaders.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I miss Avdul :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank a lot man
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:54:17 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Raid 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What movie is this from?? Looks cool
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:35:38 +0200
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...this one
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, not that dude
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lol
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/1/12670/263141-shome_hr.jpg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Watching The Raid 2.
>>>>>>>> The baseball dude reminds me of Lumi.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>>>>>>>> communication in
>>>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>>>>>>>> send to
>>>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
>>>>>>>> governing
>>>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>>>>>>>> ("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
>>>>>>>> providing
>>>>>>>> services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International")
>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>> Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>>>>>>>> independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
>>>>>>>> provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
>>>>>>>> International is
>>>>>>>> a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as
>>>>>>>> such.
>>>>>>>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
>>>>>>>> member
>>>>>>>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
