Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:30:38 +0200
It's a rogue-like game, so actions only take place once you move. You have
to keep moving forward because the Darkness chases you and once it catches
up, you die. Every action you take causes the darkness to catch up, but
you can move forward at a much faster rate than it can catch up.
The (initial) goal is to beat the Demon Lord who shows up after 400km on
normal difficulty (easy mode, I guess). He's stupidly tough and the odds
of you beating him on your first run is basically zero. Here's the
interesting bit: After every run you gain Hero Points which you can use to
unlock perks and classes for your next run. You can also spend points on a
Vault which you can use to store items from previous runs, so if you find a
kick-ass sword you can save it there after you die and then it will be
available on the next run.
It's got a multiplayer mode but you don't really play with other people.
You can just see the statuses of other people playing on the same map, and
how far they've travelled. If someone gets killed by the Demon Lord,
there's a chance you might run into them in ghost form. They drop useful
items.
It takes a while to get into it but it's one of those "just one more try"
type of games.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It looks like fun, if the trailer is anything to go by :)
>
> How exactly does the gameplay work? Seems to be a action-rpg/turn-based
> hybrid.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That One Way Heroics game was totally worth it for R5. Must have played
>> it about 50 times already.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I contributed about 20 gigs
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:42 +0000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What are we going to do about soundproofing the place?
>>>
>>> BTW, nice work on dodging the original topic. HOKAGE?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 1:06 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> have it at jeeva's , theres enough room for everyone. just don't
>>> sleepover that place can get cold at night.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:52:55 +0000
>>>
>>> We still have a couple of weeks left. I just don’t want to get to the
>>> last minute and realise that I’ll be sitting at home watching it on stream
>>> with only Paas and my cats cheering.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think I’m going to take Friday off and see if I can actually finish
>>> all the Dangerous Dave games.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:48 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I wasn't able to find a suitable venue :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Truth be told, it hasn't been terribly high on my list of priorities
>>> this past month, due to other pressing matters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Uh, doesn’t Hokage refer to a specific kage – the fire one? Then you
>>> have raikage, misukage…
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think your question should’ve been ‘Who is the fifth Kage from Jhb?’
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On an unrelated note, we still don’t have a venue organised for the Evo
>>> weekend, do we?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:14 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WHO IS THE 5TH HOKAGE FROM JOBURG
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:29:06 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Thanks fer the words of wisdom Nic. Much appreciated :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't know that f+BD can hop over ground fireballs. That's really
>>> cool. Makes sense but it definitely wasn't something I picked up on.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'll remember that df+A is good for anti-airing purposes. I've only ever
>>> used it as a combo extender into argentine backbreaker *lol*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's very little to teach you then, you've got the just of it.
>>> Your level up is strong.
>>> Ummm.....
>>> His EX gatling can be "free cancelled" into another special.
>>> He can finish launch combos with an air throw, like Mai.
>>> He can use the f+BD to hop over ground fireballs.
>>> df+A is a "good" anti air.
>>>
>>> ...that's all I got.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2014 10:14, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've noticed :P I've actually been on the receiving end of it so I
>>> know how effective it can be :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's one of the throw setups I have (mid-screen):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Argentine Backbreaker (with qcf+C followup), f+BD into super hop j.B,
>>> Argentine Backbreaker, rinse and repeat. It looks like Clark goes through
>>> (or just slightly above) the opponent during j.B and ends up on the
>>> opposite side.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The recovery from the j.B is so quick that it appears that Clark is
>>> still airborne when the throw comes out. I can alternate between the B and
>>> D versions depending on the opponent's tendencies. Or I could just do
>>> nothing and see what happens. Came across it by chance when I was messing
>>> around with Clark's jumps and it seems to work quite well. Might have
>>> limited application against a wary opponent but it should be quite
>>> effective in the beginning :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have yet to explore all of his options but that will come with time. I
>>> just need a functional Clark for now and I think I have that *lol*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> You should add this then.
>>> Standing CD
>>> Just do it when your opponent has been floored.
>>> It kills many wakeup attempts, and Clark is technically airborne during
>>> it too. Then you can cancel it with a F+BD and put the fear of god into
>>> your opponent with 3 special throw mixups, an EX machinegun combo, well
>>> pretty much all options he has.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:37, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> LB sensei ftw *lol*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I put Clark on the team for two reasons: Damage and LB's hatred of j.CD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Exactly.
>>> LB with some good advice for a change.
>>> Good stuff.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yup, that's the idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Iori is the battery for the team. I'm glad LB suggested I play him
>>> because his confirms are really easy and lead to good damage. Ryo does ok
>>> with 2-3 bars. Clark is an absolute monster with 5 and full drive meter.
>>> His range is an issue but at that point I'm in gamble mode anyway. All I
>>> really need to do is just land one hit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's a pretty good team strat actually.
>>> Your team gets and more damage from 1st to last. But you have to get
>>> closer to your opponent after each loss.
>>>
>>> Clark is a problem with meter. His range is an issue.
>>> Ryo has good range and uses some meter.
>>> EX Iori has great range and builds meter.
>>>
>>> On 30 Jun 2014 08:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah. On point.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ryo second, Clark anchor.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> you playing ex iori right?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:39:31 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> You should have told me to play Clark ages ago. I've really been missing
>>> out *lol*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I get good results on Saturday, I'll keep using him :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:36 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> please sap don't go to the clarkside. stay in the light.
>>>
>>> @rich, erm ya thanks
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:34:23 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Btw, I've been working on those KOF combos LB. I've also added Clark to
>>> my team. He's actually not that difficult to use. I even have a 100% HD
>>> combo with him and legit throw setups after knockdown.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> My team order is going to be a little different now but I think I can
>>> make it work. I'll be free in Blaz but I'll definitely try my best not to
>>> be free in KOF *lol*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's still KOF and BlazBlue LB :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> rank as it stands now:
>>>
>>>
>>> *Rank*
>>>
>>> *Participant Name*
>>>
>>> *Game/Set Wins*
>>>
>>> *Points Scored*
>>>
>>> 1
>>>
>>> Luminous
>>>
>>> 12
>>>
>>> 36
>>>
>>> 2
>>>
>>> SAPhoenix
>>>
>>> 11
>>>
>>> 35
>>>
>>> 3
>>>
>>> Sigma.g19
>>>
>>> 9
>>>
>>> 30
>>>
>>> 4
>>>
>>> Lindseyboi
>>>
>>> 7
>>>
>>> 27
>>>
>>> 5
>>>
>>> Zombiehunta
>>>
>>> 6
>>>
>>> 24
>>>
>>> 6
>>>
>>> O.M.A. Hei-Long
>>>
>>> 5
>>>
>>> 18
>>>
>>> 7
>>>
>>> Ennohex
>>>
>>> 4
>>>
>>> 17
>>>
>>> 8
>>>
>>> ANGRY MAD JIN
>>>
>>> 2
>>>
>>> 7
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ugh im number 4 , that's not good
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> If memory serves, the suggestion tabled by Lumi is that we subtract
>>> 'Points Given Up' from 'Points Scored' and add it to 'Game/Set Wins' for
>>> the final result. Lumi, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ugh...
>>> my excel skills r gna be tested today. I shall do it
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:09:13 +0200
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> I thought you guys just wanted to see what the current standings are at
>>> the sesh. I didn't know you wanted me to keep that spreadsheet!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't save it :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry LB. You'll just have to do the math man. Either that or wait until
>>> we conclude the qualifiers for the final result.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> wtf man sap, wheres the excel with the current standings?
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:59:40 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *LOL*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As requested:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://challonge.com/usf4qualifier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://challonge.com/umvc3qualifier
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Morning peeps,
>>>
>>> why am I lagging in d3?????????? this is fkd up , im so jealous of your
>>> dps right now paas, my hate for you is strong. half a million dps over 5
>>> million toughness, almost 8000 dex O_o.
>>>
>>> have you tried to do 100% evasion build? I believe its possible now
>>> since you can get over 8000 dex.
>>>
>>> @sap, can you link us to the overall standings for the 5v5 please. My
>>> predictions are that if we are 7 then I don't think Richard and manase is
>>> gna make it.
>>>
>>> so the final team, in points.
>>>
>>> me - all points
>>> gb - below me by a lot
>>> lumi - above sap
>>> sap - above zombie
>>> zombie - above richard.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:58:52 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> along with Lust of the Dead.
>>>
>>> The script there was just as riveting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The plot for this movie sounds so crazy I just must get it
>>>
>>> A brilliant doctor on a quest for revenge buys a young woman and trains
>>> her to be the ultimate assassin, implanting gun parts in her body that she
>>> must later assemble and use to kill her target before she bleeds to death.
>>>
>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3141912/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wham
>>> ACDC
>>> Red hot Chilli Pepper.
>>>
>>> On 29 Jun 2014 21:49, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> The reason it's like that it's because the Japanese have problems
>>> pronouncing V so often they write it as a B. As Manase said, Japan
>>> doesn't actually have words with a V, but since the introduction of Western
>>> terms into their vocabulary they were forced to create a symbol for it.
>>> Still, in most cases they prefer to use a B. When they know what the word
>>> means, they'll translate it correctly. For example, Forever is "foeba" in
>>> Japanese, but it's common enough for them to know it so translate it with a
>>> V. Interestingly enough, even in the original Japanese, they write
>>> Mohammad Abdul's name with a V (ヴ) so even when it's translated, it's
>>> still Avdol. Westerners know they mean Abdul though. The same thing
>>> happens with L and R. Japanese call Rolento "Lorento", presumably because
>>> they associate with the Italian name "Lorenzo". In Jojo's Anjuro is more
>>> commonly known as "Angelo". At the end of the day it just boils down to
>>> how familiar they are with the words and names.
>>>
>>> I've never realised how many of the Jojo's characters are named after
>>> music artists/songs.
>>>
>>> Vanilla Ice
>>>
>>> Steely Dan
>>>
>>> Kenny G
>>>
>>> Funny Valentine
>>>
>>> Telence T. Darby (should obviously be Terence)
>>>
>>> Iggy (Pop?)
>>>
>>> Enya [Gail]
>>>
>>> Foo Fighters
>>>
>>> Love the names in Jojos though. Whoever came up with the name "Weather
>>> Report" is a genius.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Avdol is how Japanese read and pronounce Abdul but not how the name is
>>> written.
>>>
>>> So what we see and here in games/anime is the mispronunciation of the
>>> name which is clearly wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Not in Japan. lol
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's Abdul bro :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just watched eps12 and 13 of Stardust Crusaders.
>>>
>>> I miss Avdul :(
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank a lot man
>>>
>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:54:17 +0200
>>>
>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The Raid 2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> What movie is this from?? Looks cool
>>>
>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:35:38 +0200
>>>
>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ...this one
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, not that dude
>>>
>>> Lol
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/1/12670/263141-shome_hr.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Watching The Raid 2.
>>> The baseball dude reminds me of Lumi.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
