Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:39:38 +0200
Who watched CEO? Some really crazy matches.
You can find them here, but the titles contain spoilers
https://www.youtube.com/user/StreetFighterCentral/videos
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's a rogue-like game, so actions only take place once you move. You
> have to keep moving forward because the Darkness chases you and once it
> catches up, you die. Every action you take causes the darkness to catch
> up, but you can move forward at a much faster rate than it can catch up.
>
> The (initial) goal is to beat the Demon Lord who shows up after 400km on
> normal difficulty (easy mode, I guess). He's stupidly tough and the odds
> of you beating him on your first run is basically zero. Here's the
> interesting bit: After every run you gain Hero Points which you can use to
> unlock perks and classes for your next run. You can also spend points on a
> Vault which you can use to store items from previous runs, so if you find a
> kick-ass sword you can save it there after you die and then it will be
> available on the next run.
>
> It's got a multiplayer mode but you don't really play with other people.
> You can just see the statuses of other people playing on the same map, and
> how far they've travelled. If someone gets killed by the Demon Lord,
> there's a chance you might run into them in ghost form. They drop useful
> items.
>
> It takes a while to get into it but it's one of those "just one more try"
> type of games.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> It looks like fun, if the trailer is anything to go by :)
>>
>> How exactly does the gameplay work? Seems to be a action-rpg/turn-based
>> hybrid.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That One Way Heroics game was totally worth it for R5. Must have played
>>> it about 50 times already.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I contributed about 20 gigs
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:42 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What are we going to do about soundproofing the place?
>>>>
>>>> BTW, nice work on dodging the original topic. HOKAGE?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 1:06 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> have it at jeeva's , theres enough room for everyone. just don't
>>>> sleepover that place can get cold at night.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:52:55 +0000
>>>>
>>>> We still have a couple of weeks left. I just don’t want to get to the
>>>> last minute and realise that I’ll be sitting at home watching it on stream
>>>> with only Paas and my cats cheering.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think I’m going to take Friday off and see if I can actually finish
>>>> all the Dangerous Dave games.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:48 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't able to find a suitable venue :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Truth be told, it hasn't been terribly high on my list of priorities
>>>> this past month, due to other pressing matters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Uh, doesn’t Hokage refer to a specific kage – the fire one? Then you
>>>> have raikage, misukage…
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think your question should’ve been ‘Who is the fifth Kage from Jhb?’
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On an unrelated note, we still don’t have a venue organised for the Evo
>>>> weekend, do we?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:14 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WHO IS THE 5TH HOKAGE FROM JOBURG
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:29:06 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Thanks fer the words of wisdom Nic. Much appreciated :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't know that f+BD can hop over ground fireballs. That's really
>>>> cool. Makes sense but it definitely wasn't something I picked up on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll remember that df+A is good for anti-airing purposes. I've only
>>>> ever used it as a combo extender into argentine backbreaker *lol*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There's very little to teach you then, you've got the just of it.
>>>> Your level up is strong.
>>>> Ummm.....
>>>> His EX gatling can be "free cancelled" into another special.
>>>> He can finish launch combos with an air throw, like Mai.
>>>> He can use the f+BD to hop over ground fireballs.
>>>> df+A is a "good" anti air.
>>>>
>>>> ...that's all I got.
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 10:14, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed :P I've actually been on the receiving end of it so I
>>>> know how effective it can be :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's one of the throw setups I have (mid-screen):
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Argentine Backbreaker (with qcf+C followup), f+BD into super hop j.B,
>>>> Argentine Backbreaker, rinse and repeat. It looks like Clark goes through
>>>> (or just slightly above) the opponent during j.B and ends up on the
>>>> opposite side.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The recovery from the j.B is so quick that it appears that Clark is
>>>> still airborne when the throw comes out. I can alternate between the B and
>>>> D versions depending on the opponent's tendencies. Or I could just do
>>>> nothing and see what happens. Came across it by chance when I was messing
>>>> around with Clark's jumps and it seems to work quite well. Might have
>>>> limited application against a wary opponent but it should be quite
>>>> effective in the beginning :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have yet to explore all of his options but that will come with time.
>>>> I just need a functional Clark for now and I think I have that *lol*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You should add this then.
>>>> Standing CD
>>>> Just do it when your opponent has been floored.
>>>> It kills many wakeup attempts, and Clark is technically airborne during
>>>> it too. Then you can cancel it with a F+BD and put the fear of god into
>>>> your opponent with 3 special throw mixups, an EX machinegun combo, well
>>>> pretty much all options he has.
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:37, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LB sensei ftw *lol*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I put Clark on the team for two reasons: Damage and LB's hatred of j.CD.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Exactly.
>>>> LB with some good advice for a change.
>>>> Good stuff.
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yup, that's the idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Iori is the battery for the team. I'm glad LB suggested I play him
>>>> because his confirms are really easy and lead to good damage. Ryo does ok
>>>> with 2-3 bars. Clark is an absolute monster with 5 and full drive meter.
>>>> His range is an issue but at that point I'm in gamble mode anyway. All I
>>>> really need to do is just land one hit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's a pretty good team strat actually.
>>>> Your team gets and more damage from 1st to last. But you have to get
>>>> closer to your opponent after each loss.
>>>>
>>>> Clark is a problem with meter. His range is an issue.
>>>> Ryo has good range and uses some meter.
>>>> EX Iori has great range and builds meter.
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 08:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. On point.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ryo second, Clark anchor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> you playing ex iori right?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:39:31 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> You should have told me to play Clark ages ago. I've really been
>>>> missing out *lol*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I get good results on Saturday, I'll keep using him :P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:36 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> please sap don't go to the clarkside. stay in the light.
>>>>
>>>> @rich, erm ya thanks
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:34:23 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> Btw, I've been working on those KOF combos LB. I've also added Clark to
>>>> my team. He's actually not that difficult to use. I even have a 100% HD
>>>> combo with him and legit throw setups after knockdown.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My team order is going to be a little different now but I think I can
>>>> make it work. I'll be free in Blaz but I'll definitely try my best not to
>>>> be free in KOF *lol*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There's still KOF and BlazBlue LB :P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> rank as it stands now:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Rank*
>>>>
>>>> *Participant Name*
>>>>
>>>> *Game/Set Wins*
>>>>
>>>> *Points Scored*
>>>>
>>>> 1
>>>>
>>>> Luminous
>>>>
>>>> 12
>>>>
>>>> 36
>>>>
>>>> 2
>>>>
>>>> SAPhoenix
>>>>
>>>> 11
>>>>
>>>> 35
>>>>
>>>> 3
>>>>
>>>> Sigma.g19
>>>>
>>>> 9
>>>>
>>>> 30
>>>>
>>>> 4
>>>>
>>>> Lindseyboi
>>>>
>>>> 7
>>>>
>>>> 27
>>>>
>>>> 5
>>>>
>>>> Zombiehunta
>>>>
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> 24
>>>>
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> O.M.A. Hei-Long
>>>>
>>>> 5
>>>>
>>>> 18
>>>>
>>>> 7
>>>>
>>>> Ennohex
>>>>
>>>> 4
>>>>
>>>> 17
>>>>
>>>> 8
>>>>
>>>> ANGRY MAD JIN
>>>>
>>>> 2
>>>>
>>>> 7
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ugh im number 4 , that's not good
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> If memory serves, the suggestion tabled by Lumi is that we subtract
>>>> 'Points Given Up' from 'Points Scored' and add it to 'Game/Set Wins' for
>>>> the final result. Lumi, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ugh...
>>>> my excel skills r gna be tested today. I shall do it
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:09:13 +0200
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I thought you guys just wanted to see what the current standings are at
>>>> the sesh. I didn't know you wanted me to keep that spreadsheet!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't save it :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry LB. You'll just have to do the math man. Either that or wait
>>>> until we conclude the qualifiers for the final result.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> wtf man sap, wheres the excel with the current standings?
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:59:40 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *LOL*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As requested:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://challonge.com/usf4qualifier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://challonge.com/umvc3qualifier
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Morning peeps,
>>>>
>>>> why am I lagging in d3?????????? this is fkd up , im so jealous of your
>>>> dps right now paas, my hate for you is strong. half a million dps over 5
>>>> million toughness, almost 8000 dex O_o.
>>>>
>>>> have you tried to do 100% evasion build? I believe its possible now
>>>> since you can get over 8000 dex.
>>>>
>>>> @sap, can you link us to the overall standings for the 5v5 please. My
>>>> predictions are that if we are 7 then I don't think Richard and manase is
>>>> gna make it.
>>>>
>>>> so the final team, in points.
>>>>
>>>> me - all points
>>>> gb - below me by a lot
>>>> lumi - above sap
>>>> sap - above zombie
>>>> zombie - above richard.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:58:52 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> along with Lust of the Dead.
>>>>
>>>> The script there was just as riveting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The plot for this movie sounds so crazy I just must get it
>>>>
>>>> A brilliant doctor on a quest for revenge buys a young woman and trains
>>>> her to be the ultimate assassin, implanting gun parts in her body that she
>>>> must later assemble and use to kill her target before she bleeds to death.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3141912/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Wham
>>>> ACDC
>>>> Red hot Chilli Pepper.
>>>>
>>>> On 29 Jun 2014 21:49, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The reason it's like that it's because the Japanese have
>>>> problems pronouncing V so often they write it as a B. As Manase said,
>>>> Japan doesn't actually have words with a V, but since the introduction of
>>>> Western terms into their vocabulary they were forced to create a symbol for
>>>> it. Still, in most cases they prefer to use a B. When they know what the
>>>> word means, they'll translate it correctly. For example, Forever is
>>>> "foeba" in Japanese, but it's common enough for them to know it so
>>>> translate it with a V. Interestingly enough, even in the original
>>>> Japanese, they write Mohammad Abdul's name with a V (ヴ) so even when
>>>> it's translated, it's still Avdol. Westerners know they mean Abdul
>>>> though. The same thing happens with L and R. Japanese call Rolento
>>>> "Lorento", presumably because they associate with the Italian name
>>>> "Lorenzo". In Jojo's Anjuro is more commonly known as "Angelo". At the
>>>> end of the day it just boils down to how familiar they are with the words
>>>> and names.
>>>>
>>>> I've never realised how many of the Jojo's characters are named after
>>>> music artists/songs.
>>>>
>>>> Vanilla Ice
>>>>
>>>> Steely Dan
>>>>
>>>> Kenny G
>>>>
>>>> Funny Valentine
>>>>
>>>> Telence T. Darby (should obviously be Terence)
>>>>
>>>> Iggy (Pop?)
>>>>
>>>> Enya [Gail]
>>>>
>>>> Foo Fighters
>>>>
>>>> Love the names in Jojos though. Whoever came up with the name "Weather
>>>> Report" is a genius.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Avdol is how Japanese read and pronounce Abdul but not how the name
>>>> is written.
>>>>
>>>> So what we see and here in games/anime is the mispronunciation of the
>>>> name which is clearly wrong.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not in Japan. lol
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's Abdul bro :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just watched eps12 and 13 of Stardust Crusaders.
>>>>
>>>> I miss Avdul :(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thank a lot man
>>>>
>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:54:17 +0200
>>>>
>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Raid 2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What movie is this from?? Looks cool
>>>>
>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:35:38 +0200
>>>>
>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...this one
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, not that dude
>>>>
>>>> Lol
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/1/12670/263141-shome_hr.jpg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Watching The Raid 2.
>>>> The baseball dude reminds me of Lumi.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
