RE: USF4 changes!
- From: "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:52:39 +0000
Yeah, but KOF is a serious rush down game. MK is not.
As someone who prefers to play characters that can hang back and see how things
are going, I'm a little apprehensive about giving certain characters with good
rush down capabilities and armour just another tool to force their way in.
-----Original Message-----
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Manase Zote
Sent: 12 June 2014 4:50 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
I can just imagine if we needed a meter for hoping/super hop/super jumping
rolling and running in KOF it would be so slow.
One of the few games I know where zoning is not an issue against non-zoning
characters.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Don't you need meter for some of the movement stuff in KOF? I mean the rolls?
> Who knows how this is going to work? I presume the backdashing will be enough
> to clear the space and either give you the opportunity to whiff punish or set
> up some zoning stuff.
> This is MK... they've never had proper backdashes before. They're now adding
> new movement and people are still complaining that this will reduce their
> ability to play the game? How?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Manase Zote
> Sent: 12 June 2014 4:22 PM
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>
> In other games we can backlash until the cows come home and there is no meter
> for that and the game is still fair nothing broken about the mechanic. lol In
> street fighter if you backdash non stop you corner yourself and that alone is
> bad so I still don't understand why you would need meter in helping with your
> suicide(cornering yourself).
> My suggestion is just balance the back dash so that it's not OP(like in SF,
> KOF and other 2D fighters).
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The "agility bar" backdash covers much more distance than that i think.
>> Also, if we can just backdash nonstop and avoid normals and
>> strings...rushdown/pressure characters will have problem, because
>> they'll just backdash and avoid everything all the time.
>>
>> Unless they make backdashing more technical like Tekken. I think the
>> agility bar is fair. It doesn't limit anything at all. It helps with
>> tough situation.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> MK9 didn't have a bar for back dashing and it was just fine so what
>>> was wrong with that?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > The movement and pace of the game seems to be the same as mk9
>>> > (which i think is ok but not the best). The agility bar enhances
>>> > that a lot more for
>>> > 1-2
>>> > bars. So i don't mind it. It doesn't limit the movement of game at all.
>>> > Eg.
>>> > Tekken movement but you can do a "super" backdash for 1 agility
>>> > bar (that fills up on it's own pretty nicely) to get out of Nina's
>>> > df+1
>>> > ss+1 pressure...or spend 2 agility bars to avoid nina's df+1 ss+1
>>> > pressure by using stage interactables and jump away. Not sure if
>>> > you're invincible or not during the jump...What was injustice like?
>>> >
>>> > So the basic movements is there. No limitation at all. Agility bar
>>> > helps but doesn't defy the whole movement gameplay.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> At this point no one knows how all of the above system mechanics
>>> >> are going to turn out.
>>> >> Limiting movement to a bar is a crime in any fighting game
>>> >> because you need movement for everything you do in a fighting game.
>>> >> It also affects the pacing of the overall match. So for me
>>> >> limiting movement to a bar is a gimmick and will only give
>>> >> players more problems rather than assisting them in a match.
>>> >> I still don't see how styles can solve bad match ups, zoner will
>>> >> always have an advantage from range, rushdown owns up-close...
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> > There's an agility bar. New bar. Nothing to do with EX bar. It
>>> >> > fills up pretty quickly. There's 2 bar. You use 1 to perform
>>> >> > run or a backdash (spaces out quite a bit). I think this is
>>> >> > fair. It fills up fast enough to use it every now and then. But
>>> >> > not enough to just spam nonstop. You use
>>> >> > 2 to
>>> >> > use stage interactables. So it's not a stage interactablefest
>>> >> > like Injustice. You have to decide if it'll be worth it to use
>>> >> > interactables or to just dash up to continue pressure / dash
>>> >> > away to keep zoning.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > As for variation. It's like saying Catwomen decides to do rushdown.
>>> >> > And
>>> >> > Grundy decides to do "zoning" with his zombie ground grab
>>> >> > thingy (meaning he'll not have his armor chainthrows etc.)
>>> >> > Catwomen will just run up to grundy with her claw slash and
>>> >> > ignore most of Grundy's zoning. I'm hoping the character
>>> >> > variation is NOT going to be rock/paper/scissors. Hope it helps
>>> >> > you with really bad match up, but still at the end of the
>>> >> > day...it's what you do. Because in MK9, i can just spam Kabal's
>>> >> > instant air fireball like a noob and know some combos and it'll
>>> >> > already be hard to win against kabal without having to learn
>>> >> > his advance nomad dash cancels if you play someone who has trouble
>>> >> > with zoning.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > so instead of choosing a variation and giving you instant win
>>> >> > (because you only keep a few moveset between variations). i'm
>>> >> > hoping variation helps with really bad match ups like 9-1 or
>>> >> > 8-2 to something like 6-4 or 5-5 and what not. because fighting
>>> >> > games should be about what you can do as a player.
>>> >> > just because i know stupid spamming basic kabal shouldn't give
>>> >> > me instant advantage over someone who's really good with
>>> >> > sheeva, scorpion or sub zero (don't know which characters have
>>> >> > issue with zoning in mk9...)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Manase Zote
>>> >> > <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> SAP just told me that you need meter to run?
>>> >> >> Isn't that supposed to be stone age mechanics(having a meter
>>> >> >> for running)?
>>> >> >> Who said running was broken?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> *Sigh*
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Back in MK3/UMK3/MK4 that meter also managed your combos so no
>>> >> >> meter no chain combos no running around :(
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Wynand-Ben
>>> >> >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> > Im also not seeing how it can help bad matchups.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Picking a different version of the same character or a
>>> >> >> > different character all together between matches would be
>>> >> >> > just like it was now.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Counterpicking etc.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:11:20 +0200
>>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> >> >> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> How do you get around the rock/paper/scissors character
>>> >> >> >> selection?
>>> >> >> >> Player 1 picks his zoning scorpion while player 2 goes for
>>> >> >> >> rush down version of scorpion, it will still be a bad match
>>> >> >> >> up for one of the guys regardless.
>>> >> >> >> Tools of the characters, match-up exp and lastly the skill
>>> >> >> >> level and execution will be the deciding factor.
>>> >> >> >> To me the understanding of a balance fighting is to make
>>> >> >> >> every character the same...
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Di Lhong
>>> >> >> >> <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> > Hmmm a good fighting game shouldn't be all about bad
>>> >> >> >> > match up and lack of knowledge...it should still be fun
>>> >> >> >> > and challenging in another level when your opponent knows
>>> >> >> >> > what your character can do.
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Yes there are bad match ups and character knowledge in
>>> >> >> >> > fighting games.
>>> >> >> >> > but
>>> >> >> >> > it shouldn't be in a state of "i know what you're doing,
>>> >> >> >> > but i can't retaliate at all"
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Eg. Tekken. Capos. If my opponent knows how to deal with
>>> >> >> >> > relax stance and such. I'll play in another mode :) There
>>> >> >> >> > is no "instant" win in tekken.
>>> >> >> >> > you
>>> >> >> >> > can play bears and still win against top tier character
>>> >> >> >> > because you the player are just better. shouldn't be
>>> >> >> >> > bringing a plastic ruler to a gun fight situation. should
>>> >> >> >> > be more or less "experienced fighter with a slightly
>>> >> >> >> > blunt knife" vs "an okay-ish fighter with a sharp knife".
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Manase Zote
>>> >> >> >> > <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> This method of balancing looks like a throw of dice to me.
>>> >> >> >> >> It can go either way, you potentially have a scenario
>>> >> >> >> >> where you can lose a match based on lack of character
>>> >> >> >> >> knowledge rather than skill.
>>> >> >> >> >> If the game has like 30 characters for an example
>>> >> >> >> >> multiply that by 3 so on average you need to be aware of
>>> >> >> >> >> what all 90 variations are capable of?
>>> >> >> >> >> Let's wait and see what the move list looks like and how
>>> >> >> >> >> many moves will change between 3 variations of a
>>> >> >> >> >> character.
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Di Lhong
>>> >> >> >> >> <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> > 11.59? XD
>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >> > Hopefully the character variation will be some answer
>>> >> >> >> >> > to really bad match up. Not sure how they'll balance
>>> >> >> >> >> > it tho. It'll be weird to just be a total counter to
>>> >> >> >> >> > another characters variation completely. If that's the
>>> >> >> >> >> > case, it'll be more rock paper scissors situation than
>>> >> >> >> >> > a fighting game lolz hopefully the variations will
>>> >> >> >> >> > make match ups like 9-1 to 6-4 or what not. So
>>> >> >> >> >> > there'll still be unfavourable match ups but not a
>>> >> >> >> >> > complete lose like MK9...eg. Kabal vs Sheeva...
>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Williams
>>> >> >> >> >> > <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> I think 12:00 is a safer option Rich :)
>>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM,
>>> >> >> >> >> >> <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Is 11:30 fine also?? I wanna get game time as much
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> as I can Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> your email find you!
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:15:48 +0200
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> ReplyTo: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Heya peeps, we'll be starting the Sat sessions at
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> 12pm to maximise game time.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> Anyone who is keen on starting a little earlier can
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> join us at that time.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> If you aren't able to make 12pm, that's fine as well.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ashraf Barendse
>>> >> >> >> >> >>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> I think she feeling a bit lazy today. She was like
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Can I speak to the main owner of the computer" and
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> I was like "he's at work"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> and
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> she
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> was
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> like
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> "k thanx bye"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Nicholas
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I love those.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Start talking linux, usually goes well.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "move to your start bar"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have one"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "what version of Windows are you using"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "I'm not using Windows"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "Open up Internet Explorer"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have that either"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "open your web browser"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "mkay"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "install this app"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "using my regular tar.z loader or the synaptic
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> package manage?"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "huh?"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> good times.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ashraf Barendse
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> lol, got a call from an Indian sounding lady
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> calling from "Windows Technical Department"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> How about no.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ryan Williams
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> "Can I just buy a complete game please?"
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Not going to happen in this day and age. Those
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> days are over.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicholas
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> LOL
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I don't know which I hate more about fighting games.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> The
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> update
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> approach like Street Fighter, or the supposedly
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> new game like Blazblue and Persona.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> It makes me not want to buy the games anymore,
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> because there will be an Update later.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Can I just buy a complete game please?
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Persona now?
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Blazblue now?
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm just ranting because I see there's a new
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> character coming out for P4A ...and I was
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> planning to get the new Blazblue (english
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> version)...
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In all honesty, the Capcom approach makes more
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> sense to me, as much as I dislike it.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Wynand-Ben
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> A new dark age starting off with a new Guilty
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Gear I can definitely live with :D
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:59:23 +0200
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > I'm all for the next FG dark age.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Wreal wrap.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > On 12/06/2014, Ilitirit Sama
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > Mortal Kombat Honest Trailer:
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCiVYKmCve
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > Y
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > ============================================
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > = ============================ You are
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Community mailing list.
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>>
>>> >> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> ========================================================
>>> >> >> >> >> = ================ You are subscribed to the Cape Town
>>> >> >> >> >> Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> ===========================================================
>>> >> >> >> = ============= You are subscribed to the Cape Town
>>> >> >> >> Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> ==============================================================
>>> >> >> = ========== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>>> >> >> Community mailing list.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> =================================================================
>>> >> = ======= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>>> >> Community mailing list.
>>> >>
>>> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ====================================================================
>>> = ==== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community
>>> mailing list.
>>>
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>>
> ======================================================================
> === You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community
> mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
> **********************************************************************
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
> is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
> address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
> sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
> unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the
> terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement
> letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any
> attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are
> neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
> information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
> you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
> that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
> operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
> clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
