[Civil Air Patrol] Re: UTM Funding
- From: "Daniel O'Mara" <daniel_o_mara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 20:50:36 -0600
On splitting flight costs -
I was thinking that maybe it would be best if the person who logs PIC, is
counted as two persons.
Scanner - 1/4 of cost
Observer - 1/4 of cost
PIC - 2/4
or with two scanners 1/5, 1/5, 1/5 and 2/5s.
just a quick thought
Daniel O'Mara
From: Dan <DanHollins@xxxxxxx>
Reply-To: cap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: cap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Civil Air Patrol] Re: UTM Funding
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:13:14 -0600
Background:
1 Splitting costs are potentially very complex. 2 All ideas are welcome,
but we'll need someone willing to do the accounting if we get fancy.
3 The easiest concept is air crews split flight costs ($85/hour wet -
divide by 3, or 4 with 2 scanners). Ground teams split ground costs
(vehicle fuel).
[2 scanners is tough due to weight and balance issues - would most
likely be divided by 3]
4 Let us know your thoughts pro and con.
Scott Voichoskie wrote:
ALCON,
Captain Hollins and I discussed, in minor detail, the conversation
regarding
paying for UTM's, specifically the flight time, out of our own pockets.
We
thought that the most equitable way would be to split the entire cost
evenly
among all members involved. This would eliminate a lot of confusion and
all
of us will be benefiting from the training to get qualified. Please let
us
know your thoughts. Be advised, having a different solution will
self-charge yourself with the task of implementation of that solution.
Please don't let that scare you if you indeed have a better solution.
Scott M. Voichoskie
City Administrator
City of Ashland
2304 Silver Street
Ashland, NE 68003-1500
Voice: (402) 944-3387
FAX: (402) 944-3386
http://www.ashland-ne.com/
_________________________________________________________________
Get today's hot entertainment gossip
http://movies.msn.com/movies/hotgossip?icid=T002MSN03A07001
Other related posts:
