[brailleblaster] Re: Some Thoughts

  • From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 13:06:48 -0500

Complexity now costs less and saves nightmares later. Complexity for 
complexity's sake is bad, but I don't believe that something as
essential as resource bundles in any way classifies.

Take care,
Sina

-----Original Message-----
From: brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:brailleblaster-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John J. Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 12:20 PM
To: brailleblaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [brailleblaster] Re: Some Thoughts

More. I looked at the mock-up. That was one reason that I thought it was 
time toemphasize that BrailleBlaster is one word.

I'm not familiar with app bundles, but I can't help wondering if this is 
all more complicated than it needs to be. For testing, why can't you 
just run BrailleBlaster as it is to see what errors you get.

A trivial matter but I noticed the directory name X86)64 Could you 
replace the right parenthesis with an underscore? My Linux shell doesn't 
like it.

John
 
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 08:52:17AM -0800, Alex Jurgensen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I suppose that the Mac issues should be resolved in any case. This would help 
> the Mac community as a whole.
> 
> I've built my boot loader now, but I can't test it yet.
> 
> Did you get a chance to look at my mock up yet?
> 
> What do you think of it?
> 
> Regards,
> Alex,
> 
> Alex Jurgensen,
> VoiceOver Trainer,
> 
> Visit me on the web at: http://www.vipbc.org/
> 
> 
> On 2011-02-02, at 12:19 AM, John J. Boyer wrote:
> 
> > I've read through all these messages, and I'm convinced we should stick 
> > with SWT. By the time BrailleBlaster is ready for use by anybody other 
> > than a developer the problems on the Mac may be resolved. We can add a 
> > little pressure to the Eclipse developers to help things along. The idea 
> > of using the SWT browser to present GUI content is interesting. 
> > 
> > The classpaths specified in the ant build.xml file go iknto the manifest 
> > of the BrailleBlaster jar file. This makes callinng BrailleBlaster very 
> > convenient on my flavor of Linux and on Windows. We could make different 
> > versions of BrailleBlaster for different distros, but I think that is 
> > something for the early adapters who use these distros to worry about. 
> > They will know their own flavors. And many of them won't care about the 
> > standard locations.
> > 
> > Let's learn from Alex's experience in proting BrailleBlaster to the Mac. 
> > Concern about various Linux flavors at this time is a distraction.
> > 
> > As for me, I'm concentrating on getting BrailleBlaster to work with at 
> > least generic embossers. Then I'll make a simple text editor using a 
> > GUI. the experience in doing this will be necessary to make the real 
> > GUI. The text editor will remain as a BrailleBlaster feature to be used 
> > by advanced users.
> > 
> > Incidentally, BrailleBlaster is a single word.  It should not have a 
> > space.
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > -- 
> > John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
> > Abilitiessoft, Inc.
> > http://www.abilitiessoft.com
> > Madison, Wisconsin USA
> > Developing software for people with disabilities
> > 
> > 
> > ----- End forwarded message -----
> > 
> > -- 
> > John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
> > Abilitiessoft, Inc.
> > http://www.abilitiessoft.com
> > Madison, Wisconsin USA
> > Developing software for people with disabilities
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer
Abilitiessoft, Inc.
http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Madison, Wisconsin USA
Developing software for people with disabilities



Other related posts: