Michael, I've been wondering why you were so quiet. I think the best way to create a Mercurial repository for liblouis would be to set up a new googlecode page with a slightly different name, say hgliblouis The recent googlecods pages have features that the old ones don't. After the repository was set up, I could get a clone of the empty repository. I have already created a directory of the liblouis project, minus the svn hidden directories. After doing the clone I would just add this directory, comit and push. We would lose history, of course, but I won't wory about that unless people convince me that it will make a difference. Of course, we would then have to link the new page to the old one in some way. John On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:38:51PM +0100, Michael Whapples wrote: > Personally I would be for that change to mercurial. For your interest, > there are tools which can create mercurial repositories from an SVN > repository so you do not loose history in the move. Refer to the > mercurial website for details on some of them. If you want I could > probably do this for you. > > Michael Whapples > On 06/09/11 17:47, John J. Boyer wrote: > >Right now I can't commit to the liblouis svn repository. The reason is > >stillunder investigation. Both liblouisutdml and BrailleBlaster are on > >Mercurial repositories. I have come to like Mercurial better than > >Subversion. The move would not be difficult, and the commands are quite > >similar. Getting a working copy is simpler, using the clone command. > > > >What do you think? > > > >John > > > -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities