[bookport] Re: New firmware
- From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:32:53 +0100
Hi Rob,
I never realised that. Didn't you once give us links to go back a version
about a year ago when there was some issue with some units failing? Perhaps
it wasn't book port it could be the courier as I own both.
Best
-James-
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:29 PM
Subject: [bookport] Re: New firmware
> James:
>
> The trouble is, if one misses the release before the next beta, there
> is no easy way to get the release.
>
>>>> james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/08/05 04:12PM >>>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Isn't the 2.0 fermware release available to all non-beta users anyway
> by
> now?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ROB MEREDITH" <rmeredith@xxxxxxx>
> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 9:05 PM
> Subject: [bookport] Re: New firmware
>
>
>> Joni:
>>
>> Does anyone else use that computer?
>>
>> You can use Book Port Transfer 2.0.0.0 with firmware 1.2.0.0, but
> Book
>> Port Transfer will create a notes folder which you cannot use
> properly
>> on the Book Port. You will also find that your manual discusses
> features
>> which are not in your firmware.
>>
>>>>> joni.colver@xxxxxxxxxxx 06/08/05 03:13PM >>>
>> Rob I definitely did not sign up to be a beta tester because betas
> are
>> not
>> something I like at all. I will have to decide what to do. Maybe I
>> will
>> just download the beta firmware but there is something odd here
> because
>> I am
>> 100% certain I would never have signed up for beta testing. I
> assume
>> then
>> that I should not continue with the new transfer software and the
> old
>> firmware? Will this cause conflicts for me? Thanks for your
>> response.
>>
>> Joni
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
