[bookport] Re: Audible vs. NLS
- From: "lana" <lana5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:04:22 -0600
We pay for Audible; so I guess the publishers aren't quite so concerned.
I never said that made sense.
Also, you can buy books from audiobookstand.com and download them as
overdrive, but they only let you copy them three times. If you have an
overdrive device with limited memory, and want to reread a book more than
three times, say down the road a few years, you're out of luck.
The point is, there is a payment catch with audible and a payment and use
catch with audiobookstand. When they're free, everyone gets all tied up in
knots.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kramlinger, Keith G., M.D." <kramk@xxxxxxxx>
To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:13 PM
Subject: [bookport] Audible vs. NLS
Can anyone explain why and / or how Audible has managed to successfully
make audio-formatted books securely available securely to blind-users,
but that NLS has not been able?
__________ NOD32 2558 (20070928) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
