[bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier

  • From: "Judy W" <judyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:55:41 -0500

Hi,

Just because a vendor has some in inventory is no reason to purchase in my
opinion. Before retirement, I was in adaptive purchasing for my state and I
would never buy a legacy product for anyone.

I hope Steve can unload the rest of them, but I still see them as a back up
device. 
 (smile) I agree that some of us may consider staying on list to help people
who are having problems.

Judy

-----Original Message-----
From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Holdsworth, Lynn
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:07 AM
To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier

Hi Judy,

>I don't think we need a list for a dying product. 
There are still people who need support for existing BookCouriers, and I
expect a lot of us are still happy to provide it if we can. You probably
spotted that Steve Nutt still has some to sell, so the device isn't toast
quite yet.
 
Have you considered unsubscribing?

Cheers, Lynn 

 
________________________________

From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy W
Sent: 14 June 2009 23:24
To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier


 
 
The courier is toast. I keep mine as a backup device for the stream.
Move to the device of your choice. I don't think we need a list for a dying
product.
Regards,
Judy

________________________________

From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Nutt
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 5:14 PM
To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier



Hi Will,

But the voices are junk.

All the best

Steve

________________________________

From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of william lomas
Sent: Thursday 30 April 2009 13:34
To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier

i'd gt a booksense or stream, much better technology

On 30 Apr 2009, at 13:15, Dennis Davies wrote:





Yes, I've had my doubts about the BC for over a year and the way they treat
us is unbelieveable I've wondered if they are on the way to being bankrupt?

I would support a new site but my computer skills are only at a low level.

Best wishes

Dennis Davies.

----- Original Message -----

        From: Graham John Lewis [gjl] <mailto:gjl@xxxxxxxxxx> 

        To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

        Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 12:41 PM

        Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier

                Thanks Bud.  I guess it is finally time for us all to move
on.  Before we all scatter to the four winds, I wonder if it would be a good
idea to start a new maling list (I assume Spronger will close this one down
without warning).  We clearly all have a great deal in common and will all
be on the lookout for a reploacement technology.  I sanybody up for this?

        Graham

        From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bud Kennedy
        Sent: 29 April 2009 18:57
        To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [bookcourier] new BookCourier

                I had sent a couple of email messages to Springer Design
asking about the timing of availability of the new BookCourier.  Since I had
gotten no response to my emails, I decided to call them directly.
Surprise of surprises, somebody actually answered the phone.  I very
politely asked about the plans for the release of the new BookCourier.
The response to my query was "the new Bookcourier has been discontinued."  I
asked if anything had been put on the BookCourier list to that effect,
suspecting that I had just missed the announcement.
"No, that hasn't been done yet," was the reply.  "Somebody will put a
message out as soon as we can.  We are pretty busy around here working on
something that's actually making us some money."  I have no objection to a
company working on things that make money.  Unless the company is being
funded by a philanthropic source, they have to make money so they can pay
their employees and invest in the future of the company.
However, I do object to the fact that the company couldn't take the ten
minutes necessary to publicly tell those of us who have been waiting for the
new Currier that there wasn't going to be any.  Now, we in waiting can go on
to buy a competitive product on the market.  It doesn't seem to be asking
too much that the potential customers for the new BookCourier be notified by
the company that plans for the new Bookcourier have been scrapped. 

                          Bud Kennedy

                          Bkennedy429@xxxxxxxxx

                        

Click here
<https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==
tcs3plwRgpwGoturEzSb!2xlu8K6GxYUwSMNL52V0szYFQ==>  to report this email as
spam.



--
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient
you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or
of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of
your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from
your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its
staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it cannot
accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any
attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk



This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security -
http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx



Other related posts: