Hi Graham, and everyone else. We still have a few in stock, so if you are in the UK, you can still buy them. We can also change keypadss etc. All the best Steve _____ From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graham John Lewis [gjl] Sent: Thursday 30 April 2009 18:00 To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier The problem is that mine is really on its last legs. I already had it overhauled but half the buttons don't respond now. Reading this list, I think many others are in the same position. What Really pisses me off about Spronger is that we went through all this business of whether they new version wqas to be produced or not and why they had not communicated with us several times now. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt but this reallis the last straw. They seem to have adopted a very hard nosed attitude to this customer base. Anyway, as I say, I have moved on. I am looking at the vistor stream, although I don't like the voice, and I am now going to take a look at this Talks DAISY version. Talks software is a bit costly. I assume I will have to buy an entirely new license rather than an upgrade? From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wendy Sharpe Sent: 30 April 2009 17:27 To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier Just because the new version has been scrapped, surely that doesn't mean our present BookCouriers will not continue to be supported. Does Springer own this list? Even if they do, couldn't someone else take it over? Wendy _____ From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graham John Lewis [gjl] Sent: 30 April 2009 12:42 To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookcourier] Re: new BookCourier Thanks Bud. I guess it is finally time for us all to move on. Before we all scatter to the four winds, I wonder if it would be a good idea to start a new maling list (I assume Spronger will close this one down without warning). We clearly all have a great deal in common and will all be on the lookout for a reploacement technology. I sanybody up for this? Graham From: bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookcourier-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bud Kennedy Sent: 29 April 2009 18:57 To: bookcourier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookcourier] new BookCourier I had sent a couple of email messages to Springer Design asking about the timing of availability of the new BookCourier. Since I had gotten no response to my emails, I decided to call them directly. Surprise of surprises, somebody actually answered the phone. I very politely asked about the plans for the release of the new BookCourier. The response to my query was "the new Bookcourier has been discontinued." I asked if anything had been put on the BookCourier list to that effect, suspecting that I had just missed the announcement. "No, that hasn't been done yet," was the reply. "Somebody will put a message out as soon as we can. We are pretty busy around here working on something that's actually making us some money." I have no objection to a company working on things that make money. Unless the company is being funded by a philanthropic source, they have to make money so they can pay their employees and invest in the future of the company. However, I do object to the fact that the company couldn't take the ten minutes necessary to publicly tell those of us who have been waiting for the new Currier that there wasn't going to be any. Now, we in waiting can go on to buy a competitive product on the market. It doesn't seem to be asking too much that the potential customers for the new BookCourier be notified by the company that plans for the new Bookcourier have been scrapped. Bud Kennedy Bkennedy429@xxxxxxxxx