Whoa! Tina, what was all that? The first part of your message was fine, but the rest was unreadable. Take care. Julie Morales Children are fragile. Handle with prayer. --Unknown ----- Original Message ----- From: "tina birenbaum" <tinabir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 7:39 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings so Hi and happy new year. In reading about people's scanners, it made me wonder how long their bulbs last. I have a 10 year old reading edge which used to do great on books and even mail but I seem to be lucky if it'll rbd my mail much anymore so s"ts ,i use x & "s"ts ,i j h a fr r1d me ! important /uff ,i don't worry ab ! re/ b1 mi<t ,i j h a bad bulb & h{ d y replace ~? 2c x gives me jib}i%1 or is my be/ bet probably j 6get a new scann}4 > ----- Original Message ----- >From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx >To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:15:13 -0500 >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings >Any validator can replace a book. When I validate replacement books I am >very careful with checking whether it is a truly improved copy. I don't >take the submitter's word that it is. I check for myself. I had a couple >of instants that books were submitted as improved copies, but when I >checked with K1000, they were significantly worse copies. So I rejected >them. Others have been somewhat similar but I cleaned them up some, so >they were better. And still others were the same and so I rejected them. >Tiffany, as Julie said you can always resubmit your books or email >bookshare about it. Because we should be improving the collection., not >down grading it. >Grace > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gary Petraccaro > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 1:48 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings > Who's responsible for judging the quality of a replacement. I've sent a > few replacements, but they were usually for books that I was asked to do > or of books I'd originally done and could now improve. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tiffany H. Jessen > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 4:13 AM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings > Yes, I get the letter of acceptance, then some time later, (sometimes > even > months later), I get a notice that my copy has been replaced by a > superior > quality. And yes, I use Kurzweil to rank the quality. It's not always > a big > difference, but in all of the cases so far they have been decreases in > quality. After looking over the books more closely I suppose they > could > still be considered excellent shape, but they're more borderline where > as > mine were nearly perfect. Oh well... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Silvara" <silvara@xxxxxxx > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:15 PM > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings >> Tiffany: >> Do you actually receive an email telling you that your book has been >> replaced? >> That can be very frustrating especially if you feel that the book has >> been >> down graded, not improved. >> K1000 is an excellent tool for comparing book quality. When you look at >> the list of mispelling you get to see what type of errors it has. >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Tiffany H. Jessen" <tjessen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 10:18 AM >> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings >>> Oh no, I don't worry about a validater ranking my book as good if I >>> think >>> it is excellent. My concern is when I have a book approved in >>> excellent, >>> and then X amount of time later someone else scans that same book and >>> has >>> it approved as an excellent quality, when in fact it is lower than what >>> I >>> did. I wouldn't mind my book being replaced if it were in fact a >>> superior >>> quality, the objection is when it goes the other way around. >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Mike Pietruk" <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx >>> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 6:58 AM >>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings >>>> Tiff and Shelley >>>> Perhaps it is age, I'm in my mid 50s, but I don't leg my ego >>>> into the process worry8ing whether someone labels my excellent scan as >>>> good, et al. At first, I thought it meant something; but as a >>>> validator >>>> myself, I realize that it's generally an arbitrary decision made by >>>> another human being, and nothing more. >>>> So if validator takes my excellent submission and believes it only to >>>> be >>>> good, what does it matter in the grand schemes of things? >>>> As for Lissi's questions, Julie pretty much conveys my feelings. >>>> And if a book sits too long on Step 1, as Cindy notes, I always have >>>> the >>>> option of self-validating which I did on a couple of Christmas books so >>>> that they would make it into the collection for the Christmas reading >>>> season. >>>> As a validator myself, I get to know the work styles of submitters and >>>> tend to validate those who do the work upfront so to speak. >>>> So I quickly know what will need to be done, if anything, based on my >>>> experience with their work as well as comments they supply. >>>> I attempt for quick turn arounds and attempt to avoid knitpicking as, >>>> with >>>> over 600 books on Step 1, time is best spent on titles that frankly >>>> don't >>>> need much handholding. >>>> I would only spend that time on Step 1 books that I believed were >>>> special >>>> to the collection amd might not be replacible. >>>> Spending hours upon hours validating something, in most instances, >>>> makes >>>> little sense as rescanning it would be faster. >>>> Keep in mind that 5 times the credits are given for submissions vs >>>> validations which indicates where the effort ought to be placed in a >>>> priority scheme. >>>> Just some rambling thoughts which I doubt hold much significance. To >>>> sum >>>> up, a topnotch submission requires little from the validator beyond >>>> spot >>>> checking and verification. And once one learns the work habits and >>>> tendecies of those they validate, the process becomes even more >>>> streamlined. >>>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a >>>> list >>>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject >>>> line. >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject >>> line. >>> -- >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >>> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/217 - Release Date: >>> 12/30/2005 >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/217 - Release Date: >> 12/30/2005 >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject > line. >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.9/217 - Release Date: > 12/30/2005 To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.