[bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Mike Pietruk <pietruk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 06:58:14 -0500 (EST)
Tiff and Shelley
Perhaps it is age, I'm in my mid 50s, but I don't leg my ego
into the process worry8ing whether someone labels my excellent scan as
good, et al. At first, I thought it meant something; but as a validator
myself, I realize that it's generally an arbitrary decision made by
another human being, and nothing more.
So if validator takes my excellent submission and believes it only to be
good, what does it matter in the grand schemes of things?
As for Lissi's questions, Julie pretty much conveys my feelings.
And if a book sits too long on Step 1, as Cindy notes, I always have the
option of self-validating which I did on a couple of Christmas books so
that they would make it into the collection for the Christmas reading
season.
As a validator myself, I get to know the work styles of submitters and
tend to validate those who do the work upfront so to speak.
So I quickly know what will need to be done, if anything, based on my
experience with their work as well as comments they supply.
I attempt for quick turn arounds and attempt to avoid knitpicking as, with
over 600 books on Step 1, time is best spent on titles that frankly don't
need much handholding.
I would only spend that time on Step 1 books that I believed were special
to the collection amd might not be replacible.
Spending hours upon hours validating something, in most instances, makes
little sense as rescanning it would be faster.
Keep in mind that 5 times the credits are given for submissions vs
validations which indicates where the effort ought to be placed in a
priority scheme.
Just some rambling thoughts which I doubt hold much significance. To sum
up, a topnotch submission requires little from the validator beyond spot
checking and verification. And once one learns the work habits and
tendecies of those they validate, the process becomes even more
streamlined.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Tiffany H. Jessen
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Westmoreland, J. R.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Sarah Van Oosterwijck
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Jake Brownell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Sarah Van Oosterwijck
- [bksvol-discuss] scanners' feelings
- From: Estelnalissi
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Shelley L. Rhodes
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Tiffany H. Jessen
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Tiffany H. Jessen
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Westmoreland, J. R.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Sarah Van Oosterwijck
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Jake Brownell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: Guidance needed
- From: Sarah Van Oosterwijck
- [bksvol-discuss] scanners' feelings
- From: Estelnalissi
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Shelley L. Rhodes
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: scanners' feelings
- From: Tiffany H. Jessen