Hi, Kasondra. I know what you mean, but unfortunately...or maybe fortunately, depending on which side of the fence you're on...an inaccuracy on the part of the author isn't grounds for rejection and we can't correct it. Take care. Julie Morales Email: mercy421@xxxxxxxxxxx Windows/MSN Messenger only (no email): mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx Skype: mercy0421 ----- Original Message ----- From: Kasondra Payne To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:44 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] inaccuracy in a history I have been working on the Routledge Historical Atlas of Religion in America, and I have a weird situation. The book was scanned very well, at it appears that the text is complete. However, I found some factual inaccuracies in one chapter of this book. Now I don’t want to spur religious attacks, but it is very important to get the story straight. This wasn’t a case of misspelling a name. The authors inaccurately represented an event and individuals involved. Now, I don’t know everything about all religions, but this makes me wonder if there are other inaccuracies that I wouldn’t know about. I have never seen this as a reason to reject a book, but as I said when it comes to something that is supposed to be a history, the story must be right. Any recommendations? Kasondra Payne -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/372 - Release Date: 6/21/2006