[bksvol-discuss] Re: inaccuracy in a history
- From: "Julie Morales" <mercy421@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:37:14 -0400
Hi, Kasondra. I know what you mean, but unfortunately...or maybe fortunately,
depending on which side of the fence you're on...an inaccuracy on the part of
the author isn't grounds for rejection and we can't correct it. Take care.
Julie Morales
Email:
mercy421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Windows/MSN Messenger only (no email): mercy0421@xxxxxxxxxxx
Skype: mercy0421
----- Original Message -----
From: Kasondra Payne
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:44 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] inaccuracy in a history
I have been working on the Routledge Historical Atlas of Religion in America,
and I have a weird situation. The book was scanned very well, at it appears
that the text is complete. However, I found some factual inaccuracies in one
chapter of this book. Now I don’t want to spur religious attacks, but it is
very important to get the story straight. This wasn’t a case of misspelling a
name. The authors inaccurately represented an event and individuals involved.
Now, I don’t know everything about all religions, but this makes me wonder if
there are other inaccuracies that I wouldn’t know about. I have never seen
this as a reason to reject a book, but as I said when it comes to something
that is supposed to be a history, the story must be right. Any recommendations?
Kasondra Payne
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/372 - Release Date: 6/21/2006
Other related posts: