[bksvol-discuss] Re: inaccuracy in a history
- From: "Lorana Chanicut" <loravara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:35:14 -0600
We are not supposed to edit content of the book. We may disagree with an
author, but it's not our purview to change anything.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kasondra Payne
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 11:44 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] inaccuracy in a history
I have been working on the Routledge Historical Atlas of Religion in America,
and I have a weird situation. The book was scanned very well, at it appears
that the text is complete. However, I found some factual inaccuracies in one
chapter of this book. Now I don’t want to spur religious attacks, but it is
very important to get the story straight. This wasn’t a case of misspelling a
name. The authors inaccurately represented an event and individuals involved.
Now, I don’t know everything about all religions, but this makes me wonder if
there are other inaccuracies that I wouldn’t know about. I have never seen
this as a reason to reject a book, but as I said when it comes to something
that is supposed to be a history, the story must be right. Any recommendations?
Kasondra Payne
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/372 - Release Date: 6/21/2006
Other related posts:
