[bksvol-discuss] Re: Thoughts On Older Books On Step 1
- From: Barbara <barbarab65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
I would love to receive double credit for validating textbooks. When I validate
anything, I usually read every word and this is a really tedious process. In
the end, I am getting quite an education. I would happy to validate all the
older books on literary criticism if I could get more credit for doing so.
Barbara
Jill O'Connell <jillocon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't feel that it is necessary to validate every book just because it is
on the list. I have the feeling that a lot of these textbooks may be changed
every year; this and the fact that they are difficult to find make me
unwilling to tackle them. I would rather see books on the list for over a
year simply removed and held in a special list as are books needing a rescan
just in case someone decides to validate them, but this way the list would
be kept shorter. If I saw a textbook on the wish list, that would be a
different matter, but I much prefer validating a book when I have a copy of
it to refer to.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Monica Willyard"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Thoughts On Older Books On Step 1
> Elizabeth's messages about the older books on step 1 got me to look at the
> step 1 page this evening to see what I could do to help out. Looking at
> the titles has got me wondering about something. Many of these books are
> either textbooks, essays, or other heavy nonfiction titles. I think most
> of us avoid working on books like this. I'm trying to find a solution to
> this problem. Do you think it might work to give validaters some sort of
> double credit for working on books that are over a year old? Or for
> textbooks since that's what many of these titles are? As I looked at the
> oldest books, my reaction was a groan because validating them would be
> tedious and boring to me. While some of our members do enjoy that type of
> material, I don't think I'm alone in my feelings. Would receiving double
> credit be an incentive for you personally? I'd like to know what you all
> think of my idea because I will suggest it to John if it has merrit. Does
> anyone have other ideas for encouraging people to process our more
> scholarly titles?
>
>
> "Don't let yesterday use up too much of today!" Will Rogers
> Monica Willyard, rhyami@xxxxxxxxx
> Add rhyami to your Skype if you'd like to chat.
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.1/805 - Release
> Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
