[bksvol-discuss] Re: Lisa's Harry Potter Question

Gerald,

Thanks for the kind words... it made me feel better.  Perhaps I shouldn't
have replied to that e-mail in such a rude manner, but it just got to me
that someone implied I was making assumptions.  I realize I was wrong, but
isn't that what this list is for?  I figured that having the two versions
was okay but I had no idea about the philosopher's stone being the British
version.  I thought that maybe someone had accidentally written the wrong
word in the title so I thought I'd check with the list.

Yes, I noticed the British terms and food discussion and actually, I found
it to be very interesting.  Again, thinks for the kind words.

Lisa
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerald Hovas" <geraldhovas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 5:07 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Lisa's Harry Potter Question


> Lisa,
>
> People can be rather touchy about their Harry Potter, can't they?
Actually,
> I suspect people were not reading the rest of their e-mail before replying
> to your message, instead of implying that you shouldn't have asked the
> question by answering your question that many times.
>
> At least that is what I would hope since I, for one, thought you had a
valid
> question.  I knew about the two different versions of the books and still
> found the list confusing due to the order in which the books were listed.
I
> had to take a close look at the list myself to realize there weren't
> duplicates the first time I read that page.
>
> Don't let this prevent you from asking questions in the future.
>
> BTW, in case you didn't notice, your question spawned a new discussion on
> the Brittish language and Brittish food that sounded like it made several
> people hungry despite Shelley's talk of blood pudding.
>
> Gerald
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Lisa Leonardi
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 3:29 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Harry Potter
>
>
> Excuse me, I wasn't making any assumption!  I was stating that there
> appeared to be duplicates and I thought that someone could verify if there
> were or weren't.  Sorry I'm not in the know on all things Harry Potter.  I
> was only trying to helt.  Next time, I'll think twice before doing so.
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: