I didn't find that book in the collection, Cindy. Valerie Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary! Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years http://www.bookshare.org/ > >From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> >To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Sun, March 18, 2012 12:06:27 AM >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote References > > > Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815 >Gordon S. Wood > > > > >Here is a book I proofed in Word and put the footnote numbers in superscript. >I >saved in rtf to upload it. >If you find out that he superscript numbers aren't saved, please let me know >so >I don't waste time doing it any more > > >Cindy >Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary! > >TinyURL.com/752cyrs > > > > > > ________________________________ From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 8:55 PM >>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote >References >> >>I didn't realize the tool preserved subscript and superscript. Does someone >>have a book suggestion I can look at so I can see how they are handled and if >>they are the same as in Word. Just curious, you know. LOL >>Valerie >> >> >>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary! >>Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years >>http://www.bookshare.org/ >> >> >> >>----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> >>> To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Sat, March 17, 2012 9:36:59 PM >>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote >>>References >>> >>> >>> >>> Kane, what's the book, and how long is it? I like proofing biographies and >>> I > >>>actually enjoy footnotes. I enjoy putting them in superscript; As sighted >>>person I find them much less confusing when reading a book than when they're >>>in >>> >>>brackets or on the line above the line of text in regular fonts. I probably >>>sounds odd (some of us proofreaders are odd, smile) but I find the file with >>> >>>proper footnotes aesthetically pleasing. Some scanners of books I've proofed >>> >>>have carefully raised the number to the l line above (format, font, >>>character > >>>position, raise) then put in how much in the space. I don't remember what >>>they've put there. Maybe .3 or 3. Ican't tell by sight if they are actually >>>on >> >>>the proper line so I change them to superscript; sometimes, too, the scanner >>>has >>> >>>forgotten to raise the number part way through, and sometimes a numeral , >>>is > >>>too large 2, 8,9 to fit comfortably on the proper line.I've learned to >>>make > >>>them superscript from the >>> beginning rather than leaving what I think is o.k. and then finding I >>> need >>>(want) to go back and change them). >>> >>> TinyURL.com/752cyrs >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >________________________________ >>> > From: Mayrie ReNae <mayrierenae@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 4:02 PM >>> >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote >>>References >>> > >>> >Hi Kane, >>> > >>> >You can leave the handling of footnotes for the proofreader, as this is a >>> >proofreading task technically. However, please don't get rid of your print >>> >copy of the book until the book has been added to the Bookshare collection. >>> >The person who chooses to proofread it may need to contact you to verify or >>> >clarify accuracy of text, and a book with footnotes as you describe is >>> >likely to spark lots and lots of clarifying questions from a proofreader >>> >trying to give Bookshare patrons the cleanest and most accurate reading >>> >experience possible. >>> > >>> >I have no idea whether there is a way to change super or subscripted text >to >>> >sit where regular text does when using Kurzweil 1000. >>> > >>> >There isn't a quick way to handle footnotes properly to have them read >>> >accurately for Bookshare submissions. >>> > >>> >Sorry I haven't been of more help. >>> > >>> >It's great to have you volunteering with us, and thanks for having such >>> >great attention to details! That kind of thing is very much appreciated! >>> > >>> >Happy scanning. >>> > >>> >Mayrie >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >-----Original Message----- >>> >From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kane Brolin >>> >Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 12:24 PM >>> >To: Kurzweil 1000 Discussion List; bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote >>References >>> > >>> >Hello. I'm attempting to finish scanning my first-ever Bookshare >>> >contribution: a nonfiction biographical work that includes a lot of >>> >citations. These citations exist primarily in the form of endnotes; but of >>> >course the numbering of these endnotes is visible throughout each page. >I'm >>> >trying to figure out an efficient way to mark these up in Kurzweil 1000 >>> >so >I >>> >don't have to spend endless time reading the entire book on my PC, placing >>> >each number citation in the right syntax manually. >>> > >>> >When I looked through the Bookshare Volunteers' manual, I found the >>> >following reference on such citations: >>> >https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/4.8+C.+Footnotes%2C+Superscripts+and+S >>> >ubscripts%2C+and+Sidebars. >>> >It says that square brackets should go around each of these citation >>> >numbers within the body of the text. It also says, though, that OCR >>> >software has a "global drop" feature that can be invoked to cause all >>> >superscripted text to be lowered visually to the same height as the body of >>> >the document. But I don't know how this would work in Kurzweil 1000, or if >>> >there is any efficient way to adjust or standardize citations of this kind >>> >that will permit me to complete scanning this accurately without taking a >>> >whole year to scan this book. In some cases, I've counted as many as 20 >>> >citations on one page. >>> > >>> >Thanks for any advice you can provide. I've written this to both the >>> >Kurzweil 1000 discussion list and the Kurzweil Volunteers' discussion >list. >>> > >>> >Kind regards, >>> > >>> >Kane Brolin >>> >To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >of >>> >available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>> > >>> >To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>> >of >> >>>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list >>> of > >>>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >>> >>> >>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to >>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of >>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. >> >> >> >>