[bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote References

  • From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:54:38 -0700 (PDT)

I didn't find that book in the collection, Cindy.
 Valerie


Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
http://www.bookshare.org/


>
>From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sun, March 18, 2012 12:06:27 AM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote 
References
>
>
>  Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815             
>Gordon S. Wood 
>
>
>
>
>Here is a book I proofed in Word and put the footnote numbers in superscript. 
>I 
>saved in rtf to upload it.
>If you find out that he superscript numbers aren't saved, please let me know 
>so 
>I don't waste time  doing it any more
> 
> 
>Cindy
>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary! 
>
>TinyURL.com/752cyrs
> 
>  
>
>
>
>
________________________________
 From: Valerie Maples <vlmaples@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 8:55 PM
>>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote 
>References
>> 
>>I didn't realize the tool preserved subscript and superscript.  Does someone 
>>have a book suggestion I can look at so I can see how they are handled and if 
>>they are the same as in Word.  Just curious, you know.  LOL
>>Valerie
>>
>>
>>Join us in celebrating our 10th Anniversary!
>>Bookshare: Bringing Reading to Life for 10 Years
>>http://www.bookshare.org/
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message ----
>>> From: Cindy <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Sat, March 17, 2012 9:36:59 PM
>>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote 
>>>References
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Kane, what's the book, and how long is it? I like proofing biographies  and 
>>> I 
>
>>>actually enjoy footnotes. I enjoy putting them in superscript; As sighted  
>>>person I find them much less confusing when reading a book than when they're 
>>>in  
>>>
>>>brackets or on the line above the line of text in regular fonts. I probably  
>>>sounds odd (some of us proofreaders are odd, smile) but I find the file with 
>>> 

>>>proper footnotes aesthetically pleasing. Some scanners of books I've proofed 
>>> 

>>>have carefully raised the number to the l line above (format, font, 
>>>character  
>
>>>position, raise) then  put in how much in the space. I don't remember what  
>>>they've put there. Maybe .3 or 3. Ican't tell by sight if they are actually 
>>>on  
>>
>>>the proper line so I change them to superscript; sometimes, too, the scanner 
>>>has  
>>>
>>>forgotten to raise the number  part way through, and sometimes a numeral , 
>>>is  
>
>>>too large   2, 8,9 to fit comfortably on the proper line.I've learned to 
>>>make  
>
>>>them superscript from the
>>>  beginning rather than leaving what I think is o.k.  and then finding I 
>>> need 

>>>(want) to go back and change them).
>>> 
>>> TinyURL.com/752cyrs
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> >________________________________
>>> >  From: Mayrie ReNae <mayrierenae@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>> >Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 4:02 PM
>>> >Subject: [bksvol-discuss]  Re: Efficient Way To  Treat/Include Footnote 
>>>References
>>> > 
>>> >Hi  Kane,
>>> >
>>> >You can leave the handling of footnotes for the  proofreader, as this is a
>>> >proofreading task technically. However, please  don't get rid of your print
>>> >copy of the book until the book has been  added to the Bookshare 
collection.
>>> >The person who chooses to proofread it  may need to contact you to verify 
or
>>> >clarify accuracy of text, and a book  with footnotes as you describe is
>>> >likely to spark lots and lots of  clarifying questions from a proofreader
>>> >trying to give Bookshare patrons  the cleanest and most accurate reading
>>> >experience  possible.
>>> >
>>> >I have no idea whether there is a way to change super  or subscripted text 
>to
>>> >sit where regular text does when using Kurzweil  1000.
>>>  >
>>> >There isn't a quick way to handle footnotes properly to  have them read
>>> >accurately for Bookshare submissions.
>>> >
>>> >Sorry  I haven't been of more help.
>>> >
>>> >It's great to have you volunteering  with us, and thanks for having such
>>> >great attention to details!  That  kind of thing is very much appreciated!
>>> >
>>> >Happy  scanning.
>>> >
>>> >Mayrie
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >-----Original  Message-----
>>> >From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Kane Brolin
>>> >Sent: Saturday,  March 17, 2012 12:24  PM
>>> >To: Kurzweil 1000 Discussion List; bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject:  [bksvol-discuss] Efficient Way To Treat/Include Footnote  
>>References
>>> >
>>> >Hello.  I'm attempting to finish scanning my  first-ever Bookshare
>>> >contribution: a nonfiction biographical work that  includes a lot of
>>> >citations.  These citations exist primarily in the form  of endnotes; but 
of
>>> >course the numbering of these endnotes is visible  throughout each page.  
>I'm
>>> >trying to figure out an efficient way to mark  these up in Kurzweil 1000 
>>> >so 
>I
>>> >don't have to spend endless time reading  the entire book on my PC, placing
>>> >each number citation in the right  syntax manually.
>>>  >
>>> >When I looked through the Bookshare Volunteers'  manual, I found the
>>> >following reference on such citations:
>>> 
>https://wiki.benetech.org/display/BSO/4.8+C.+Footnotes%2C+Superscripts+and+S
>>> >ubscripts%2C+and+Sidebars.
>>> >It  says that square brackets should go around each of these  citation
>>> >numbers within the body of the text.  It also says, though, that  OCR
>>> >software has a "global drop" feature that can be invoked to cause  all
>>> >superscripted text to be lowered visually to the same height as the  body 
of
>>> >the document.  But I don't know how this would work in Kurzweil  1000, or 
if
>>> >there is any efficient way to adjust or standardize citations  of this kind
>>> >that will permit me  to complete scanning this accurately  without taking a
>>> >whole year to scan this book.  In some cases, I've  counted as many as 20
>>> >citations on one page.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks for  any advice you can provide.  I've written this to both the
>>> >Kurzweil 1000  discussion list and the Kurzweil Volunteers' discussion  
>list.
>>> >
>>> >Kind regards,
>>> >
>>> >Kane Brolin
>>> >To  unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>> >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >put  the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list  
>of
>>> >available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject  line.
>>> >
>>> >To unsubscribe from this list send a blank  Email  to
>>> >bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >put  the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list 
>>> >of  
>>
>>>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject  line.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >  
>>>  To unsubscribe from this list send  a blank Email to
>>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> put  the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list 
>>> of  
>
>>>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>> 
>>> 
>>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line.  To get a list of 
>>available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
>>
>>
>>
>>

Other related posts: