Judith: I repeat: if you use Word 2007, you use XML, just as if you use SVG, you use SVG. Geoffrey: Well now it hangs on what we mean by "requirement". Consider. Before 1983, a knowledge of Word wasn't a requirement for tech writing. In UNIX etc, you could do things in plain text. or .man pages, or whatever. And there was Write, and Spellbinder, and WordPerfect etc. etc. etc.. Some would suggest that a knowledge of Word is requirement for most tech writing work today. At least the ads specify that, so maybe that's a real requirement? And maybe similar things will happen with XML. But you can still be a tech writer without Word. Just not paid all that often or regularly. So requirements change and develop. [And meanwhile, back at the ranch, if you think you can freely use FrameMaker to do most XML work today, without knowing a jot or two about XML, I'm sorry, you've either run into miracle territory or you haven't tried to use it much, at least not the way Adobe and IBM use it.] I wouldn't say you have to know about DTDs and schemas in detail, any more than I'd suggest you need to know how any of the parsers work in detail, (back to cars and engines!) but if you don't understand the concepts of tagged text and its implications for context, you can miss the whole point... either by expecting too much, or not knowing how you can save time and effort. Today's Word may well be tomorrow's DITA. --Peter M ************************************************** To view the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes). To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************