atw: Re: OT: performance appr - training [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

  • From: Peter.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:55:51 +1000

Isn't there an accepted technical term for this already ?      Claytons ?


Peter M


From:   "Terry Dowling" <Terrence.Dowling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:     <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   28/08/2012 07:24 PM
Subject:        atw: OT: performance appr - training
Sent by:        austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



We?re in the process of scheduling performance appraisals, with one of the 
standard questions asking ?what training/experience would help you and the 
company??. As none of the training I?ve suggested in previous years has 
come to fruition, and my colleagues are similarly affected, I?m thinking 
we include a suggestion of ?Training on how to accept the non-provision of 
training? What do you reckon? We could genericise it to something like 
?humility training?.
--
This message contains privileged and confidential information only 
for use by the intended recipient.  If you are not the intended 
recipient of this message, you must not disseminate, copy or use 
it in any manner.  If you have received this message in error, 
please advise the sender by reply e-mail.  Please ensure all 
e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or 
using.

Other related posts:

  • » atw: Re: OT: performance appr - training [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] - Peter . Martin